Elections: Election Day holiday: voting by mail.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the statewide general election to be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each even-numbered year. Existing law designates specific days as holidays in this state. This bill would add the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of any even-numbered year to the list of state holidays. By increasing the duties of local officials in connection with the creation of a new state holiday, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires county elections officials to mail a ballot to every registered voter for all elections, as provided. Existing law authorizes any county to conduct an all-mailed ballot election if certain requirements are met. This bill would repeal the provisions requiring county elections officials to mail a ballot to every registered voter and authorizing a county to conduct an all-mailed ballot election. The bill would instead authorize a voter to request a vote by mail ballot for any election, as specified. The bill would also authorize a voter to apply to become a permanent vote by mail voter, in which case the voter would receive a vote by mail ballot for every election. (3) Existing law authorizes a voter who is unable to return their ballot to designate any other person to return the ballot, as specified. This bill would restrict the persons a voter may authorize to return the voter's ballot to only the voter's spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, or a person residing in the same household as the voter. (4) Under existing law, a ballot is timely cast if it is received by the elections official no later than 7 days after election day and postmarked on or before election day. This bill would reduce the deadline for receiving a ballot to 3 days after election day. (5) This bill would make various conforming and clarifying changes. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2022
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Dec 5, 2022
Last action Mar 20, 2023
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
2
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Mar 20, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
lower
Jan 30, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ELECTIONS.
lower
Jan 26, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ELECTIONS. Read second time and amended.
lower
Jan 26, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on ELECTIONS and G.O.
lower
Dec 6, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 5.
lower
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 13
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 13. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline