Redevelopment: successor agency: City of Lake Forest.
Summary
Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies to, among other things, wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and make payments due for enforceable obligations. In that regard, existing law requires the county auditor-controller to create within the county treasury a Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (Fund) for the property tax revenues related to each former redevelopment agency for administration by the county auditor-controller. Existing law requires the Orange County Auditor Controller to allocate property tax revenues attributable to the El Toro Project Area between the Fund established for the former Orange County Development Agency and the Fund established for the former Lake Forest Redevelopment Agency, as provided, to implement a specified agreement that transferred territorial jurisdiction of the El Toro Project Area from the Orange County Redevelopment Agency to the Lake Forest Redevelopment Agency. This bill would require the Orange County Auditor Controller, upon receipt of the final resolution of dissolution for the successor agency to the former Orange County Development Agency, to allocate property tax revenues attributable to the El Toro Project Area to the Fund established for the former Lake Forest Redevelopment Agency. By revising the duties of local government officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law generally requires a successor agency to submit a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule to certain entities, including the Department of Finance, and requires the successor agency to make payments pursuant to that schedule. When all enforceable obligations have been retired or paid off, all real property has been disposed of, and all outstanding litigation has been resolved, existing law requires the successor agency to submit a request to formally dissolve to its oversight board, which is required to approve the request and submit it to the department for approval, as specified. Under this bill, the allocation of revenues into the Fund established for the former Lake Forest Redevelopment Agency pursuant to the transfer agreement and the listing of those payments by the successor agency to the Orange County Development Agency on its Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule would not preclude the approval of a request for dissolution of the successor agency to the Orange County Development Agency. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Lake Forest. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Sep 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Sep 2023
Signed into Law
Oct 2023
Introduced Feb 16, 2023
Signed Oct 4, 2023
Floor votes · Senate Sep 11, 2023 · Assembly May 25, 2023
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Sep 11, 2023
D
Democratic31
96% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Oct 4, 2023
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2023
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Sep 11, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2550.).
upper
Jul 3, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 21, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 7, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 25, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1812.)
lower
May 17, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 17).
lower
Apr 27, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 27, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 23, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 20, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 16, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 16, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 17, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Diane Dixon
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1270
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1270. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline