State employees: compensation: firefighters.
Summary
Existing law provides that in order for the state to recruit skilled firefighters for the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, it is the policy of the state to consider prevailing salaries and benefits prior to making salary recommendations. Existing law requires the Department of Human Resources, in order to provide comparability in pay, to take into consideration the salary and benefits of other jurisdictions employing 75 or more full-time firefighters who work in California. This bill would require the state to pay firefighters who are rank-and-file members of State Bargaining Unit 8, employed by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, within 15% of the average salary for corresponding ranks in 20 listed California fire departments. The bill would require the state and the exclusive representative for State Bargaining Unit 8 to jointly survey annually and calculate the estimated average salaries for those fire departments. The bill would provide that when determining compensation for uniformed classifications of the department, it is the policy of the state to consider the salary of corresponding ranks within the comparable jurisdictions listed, as well as other factors, including internal comparisons. The bill would require any salary increase for firefighters under these provisions to be implemented through a memorandum of understanding, in accordance with specified procedures governing collective bargaining agreements. The bill would include related legislative findings.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Aug 2024
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2023
Last action Aug 26, 2024
Floor votes · Assembly May 25, 2023
How they voted
77–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 80
May 25, 2023
D
Democratic62
96% Yea
R
Republican18
94% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Aug 15, 2024
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 15).
upper
Sep 1, 2023
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jul 3, 2023
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jun 22, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 7, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
May 25, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1767.)
lower
May 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 18).
lower
May 3, 2023
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 26, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 12, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 2, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
lower
Feb 17, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Heath Flora
RRepublican
Co
Dawn Addis
DDemocratic
Co
Matt Haney
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1254
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1254. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline