AB 1248 California Assembly · 2023-2024 Regular Session

Local redistricting: independent redistricting commissions.

Summary
Existing law generally requires county boards of supervisors, city councils, and the governing boards of school districts, community college districts, and other special districts, if those bodies are elected using district-based elections, to adopt new boundaries for the districts following each federal decennial census. Notwithstanding that requirement, existing law authorizes a local jurisdiction other than a charter city to establish an independent redistricting commission to adopt new boundaries for the local jurisdiction's districts. This bill would require a county, general law city, charter city, or charter city and county that contains over 300,000 residents, and a school district or community college district that contains over 500,000 residents, to establish an independent redistricting commission to adopt district boundaries after each federal decennial census. The bill would require a county, general law city, charter city, or charter city or county with over 300,000 residents, and a school district or community college district with over 500,000 residents, that does not enact an ordinance, resolution, or charter amendment establishing an independent redistricting commission by January 1, 2030, and January 1 of every subsequent year ending in 0, to establish a 14-member independent redistricting commission according to specified procedures, including procedures for the random selection of the members of the commission from among applicants meeting certain qualifications. By requiring certain local jurisdictions to establish independent redistricting commissions to adopt district boundaries, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would prohibit a member of an independent redistricting commission from communicating with any individual or organization regarding redistricting matters, except as provided. The bill would require the State Auditor to provide the contact information of any applicant to serve on the Citizens Redistricting Commission, which is responsible for adjusting the boundary lines of the congressional, legislative, and State Board of Equalization districts, to any city or county that has established an independent or hybrid redistricting commission, provided that the applicant has consented to share this information and the city or county has requested to receive this information, and to inform those applicants of opportunities to serve on an independent or hybrid redistricting commission. The bill would require the State Auditor to establish a database and create and advertise a process for this exchange of information. Under existing law, independent redistricting commissions have been established for the Counties of Los Angeles, San Diego, Riverside, Fresno, and Kern. The bill would exempt the Counties of Los Angeles, San Diego, Riverside, Fresno, and Kern from the bill's provisions requiring a county with over 300,000 residents to establish an independent redistricting commission, unless the existing law provisions establishing independent redistricting commissions for those counties are repealed or invalidated. The bill also would exempt a charter city with a population of at least 2,500,000 people from the bill's provisions if specified conditions are met, including if both this bill and Senate Bill 52 are enacted and if the city complies with certain provisions in Senate Bill 52 that require such cities to establish independent redistricting commissions. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 23003 of the Elections Code proposed by Assembly Bill 764 to be operative only if this bill and Assembly Bill 764 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Aug 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Sep 2023
Vetoed
Jan 2024
Introduced Feb 16, 2023 Vetoed Jan 3, 2024
Floor votes · Senate Sep 12, 2023 · Assembly May 30, 2023

How they voted

30–7
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Sep 12, 2023
D Democratic31
30 Yea 1
96% Yea
R Republican9
7 Nay 2
77% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
32
Key actions
13
Committee
11
Amendments
9
Feb 1, 2024
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Jan 3, 2024
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 7, 2023
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 13, 2023
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 62. Noes 16. Page 3364.).
lower
Sep 12, 2023
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 12, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 7. Page 2627.).
upper
Sep 7, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Sep 1, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Sep 1, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (September 1).
upper
Aug 21, 2023
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Aug 14, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 2, 2023
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jul 13, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 6, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 20, 2023
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 13, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Jun 7, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E. & C.A. and GOV. & F.
upper
May 30, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 61. Noes 17. Page 1931.)
lower
May 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 18, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 18).
lower
May 10, 2023
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 27, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 19, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 2, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on ELECTIONS and L. GOV.
lower
Feb 17, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 11 co-sponsors

Sponsors