Fast food restaurant industry: Fast Food Council: health, safety, employment, and minimum wage.
Summary
Existing law, which is suspended pursuant to a referendum petition, establishes, until January 1, 2029, the Fast Food Council (council) within the Department of Industrial Relations and prescribes its powers. Existing law, among other things, prescribes the purposes, duties, and limitations of the council, including a requirement that the council promulgate minimum fast food restaurant employment standards. Existing law sets standards for any minimum wage the council establishes. This bill would repeal those existing provisions on January 1, 2024, if a specified referendum is withdrawn by its proponents by that date. If the referendum is withdrawn, in addition to that repeal, this bill would, until January 1, 2029, or as otherwise provided, establish the Fast Food Council and prescribe the council's purposes, duties, and limitations, as described, establish an hourly minimum wage for fast food restaurant employees, as described, authorize the council to increase the hourly minimum wage pursuant to specified parameters, and set forth requirements, limitations, and procedures for adopting and reviewing fast food restaurant health, safety, and employment standards. The bill would require all standards, rules, and regulations developed by the council to be issued, amended, or repealed, as applicable, in the manner prescribed in the Administrative Procedure Act, but as modified, and would require the council to petition the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board and the Civil Rights Council if any minimum standards fall within their jurisdiction. Existing law prohibits, among other things, an employer or any person acting on behalf of the employer from making, adopting, or enforcing any rule, regulation, or policy preventing an employee from disclosing information to a government or law enforcement agency, among other individuals and entities, if the employee has reasonable cause to believe that the information discloses specified violations of law, regardless of whether disclosing the information is part of the employee's job duties. Existing law imposes, in addition to other penalties, a civil penalty on certain employers for each violation of this provision, except as specified. This bill would also deem the council a governmental agency for purposes of the above-described prohibition. The bill would additionally prohibit a fast food restaurant operator from discharging or in any manner discriminating or retaliating against any employee due to the employee's participation in or testimony to any proceeding convened by the council. This bill would prohibit any city, county, or city and county from enacting or enforcing any ordinance or regulation applicable to fast food restaurant employees that sets the amount of wages or salaries for fast food restaurant employees, except as provided. By imposing additional requirements on local agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law establishes in the Department of Industrial Relations the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement under the direction of the Labor Commissioner. Existing law authorizes the Labor Commissioner to investigate employee complaints and to provide for a hearing in any action to recover wages, penalties, and other demands for compensation. This bill would require the Labor Commissioner to enforce compliance with the minimum fast food restaurant employment standards and any other standards promulgated pursuant to the bill's provisions and would set forth procedures for enforcing the standards. By expanding the application of crimes associated with those enforcement procedures, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for fast food restaurant workers. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Sep 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Sep 2023
Signed into Law
Sep 2023
Introduced Feb 16, 2023
Signed Sep 28, 2023
Floor votes · Senate Sep 14, 2023 · Assembly Jun 1, 2023
How they voted
32–8
Passed
Total votes 40
Sep 14, 2023
D
Democratic31
100% Yea
R
Republican9
88% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
14
Committee
15
Amendments
3
Sep 28, 2023
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 14, 2023
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 3607.).
lower
Sep 14, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (September 14).
lower
Sep 14, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 14, 2023
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 14, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 32. Noes 8. Page 2789.).
upper
Sep 12, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (September 12).
upper
Sep 12, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (September 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Sep 11, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
Sep 11, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Sep 11, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jul 11, 2023
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 28, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 14, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and JUD.
upper
Jun 1, 2023
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-22-16)
assembly
May 31, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 42. Noes 22. Page 2067.)
lower
May 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 18).
lower
May 10, 2023
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 25, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 13, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 2, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & E. and JUD.
lower
Feb 17, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Chris Holden
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1228
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1228. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline