Public Employment Relations Board: Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District: employee relations.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) in state government as a means of resolving disputes and enforcing the statutory duties and rights of specified public employers and employees under various acts regulating collective bargaining. Existing law includes within PERB's jurisdiction the resolution of disputes alleging violation of rules and regulations adopted by a public agency, as defined, concerning unit determinations, representations, recognition, and elections, as specified. Existing law authorizes PERB to adopt rules and regulations to carry out its purposes, as provided. Existing law does not apply the above provisions to employees of specified transit agencies, including the Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District, among others. Existing law provides for the establishment of the Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District. Existing law requires any question as to whether a majority of the district's employees in an appropriate unit desire to be represented by a labor organization to be submitted to PERB. Existing law requires the district to bargain in good faith with a duly designated or certified labor organization and, when an agreement is reached, to execute a written collective bargaining agreement with the labor organization covering the wages, hours, and working conditions of the employees represented by the labor organization in an appropriate unit, and to comply with the terms of the agreement, as specified. This bill would grant PERB jurisdiction to enforce these labor provisions applicable to the Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District. The bill would give PERB the exclusive jurisdiction to make the initial determination of whether the charge of unfair practice is justified and, if so, to determine the appropriate remedy necessary. The bill would provide that exclusive representatives have the right to represent their bargaining units in employer-employee relations with the district, and employees have the right to be represented by their exclusive representative. The bill would require the district to give reasonable written notice to an exclusive representative of its intent to make any changes to matters within the scope of representation for purposes of providing the exclusive representative a reasonable amount of time to negotiate with the district regarding the proposed changes. The bill would also make it unlawful for the district or an employee organization to engage in certain acts, including imposing or threatening to impose reprisals on employees, or refusing to meet and negotiate in good faith in mutually agreed upon impasse procedures. By requiring the district transit agencies to adjudicate claims before PERB, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Senate Passage
May 2022
Assembly Passage
Aug 2022
Signed into Law
Sep 2022
Introduced Feb 9, 2022
Signed Sep 2, 2022
Floor votes · Senate May 23, 2022 · Assembly Aug 11, 2022
How they voted
26–8
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 37
May 23, 2022
D
Democratic29
86% Yea
R
Republican8
87% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
11
Committee
7
Amendments
5
Sep 2, 2022
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 15, 2022
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 10. Page 4830.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 11, 2022
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 11, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 59. Noes 15. Page 5820.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 3, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (August 3).
lower
Jun 23, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 22, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 22).
lower
May 27, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
lower
May 23, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 9. Page 3836.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 19, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3777.) (May 19).
upper
Apr 28, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 3513.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 19, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3415.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 17, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and JUD.
upper
Mar 9, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 16, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 9, 2022
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
John Laird
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 957
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 957. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline