Enforcement of money judgments: exemptions.
Summary
Existing law identifies various types of property of a judgment debtor that are exempt from the enforcement of a money judgment. Existing law provides that all of the exemptions that are applicable to the enforcement of a money judgment are applicable in a bankruptcy case, regardless of whether there is a money judgment against the debtor or whether a money judgment is being enforced by execution sale or any other procedure, unless the debtor elects certain alternative exemptions in lieu of all other statutory exemptions provided. Existing law provides that money held in an account owned by the judgment debtor and established pursuant to the Golden State Scholarshare Trust Act is exempt from the enforcement of a money judgment and also as an alternative exemption in a bankruptcy case, and the amount exempted is limited to contributions to the account, as specified, prior to the date of filing of the debtor's petition for bankruptcy, not to exceed the amount of the annual gift exclusion under Section 2503(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect at the time of the contribution. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to adjust, every 3 years, the amounts of the exemptions applicable to exempt property based on the change in the annual California Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers. This bill would specify that the alternative exemption for money held in a Scholarshare account would instead be limited to an amount not to exceed the amount of the annual gift exclusion under Section 2503(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect at the time of filing of the debtor's petition for bankruptcy. The bill would specify that the exemption applicable to the enforcement of a money judgment for money held in a Scholarshare account would instead be limited to contributions to the account, as specified, prior to the date of entry of a money judgment and not to exceed the amount of the annual gift exclusion under Section 2503(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in effect at the time of entry of the money judgment. The bill would expressly specify that the amounts of these exemptions are not subject to adjustment by the Judicial Council.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Jun 2022
Senate Passage
Apr 2022
Assembly Passage
Jun 2022
Signed into Law
Jun 2022
Introduced Feb 9, 2022
Signed Jun 20, 2022
Floor votes · Senate Apr 7, 2022 · Assembly Jun 9, 2022
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 37
Apr 7, 2022
D
Democratic29
96% Yea
R
Republican8
87% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Jun 20, 2022
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 9, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 69. Noes 0. Page 5305.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Jun 1, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 1).
lower
May 5, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 7, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 3358.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Mar 30, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 3254.) (March 29).
upper
Feb 16, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 9, 2022
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 956
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 956. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline