The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000: protest proceedings: procedural consolidation.
Summary
Existing law, the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, provides the exclusive authority and procedure for the initiation, conduct, and completion of changes of organization and reorganization for cities and districts, except as specified. Under existing law, in each county there is a local agency formation commission (commission) that oversees these changes of organization and reorganization. Existing law authorizes a commission to dissolve an inactive district if specified conditions are satisfied. This bill would also authorize a commission to initiate a proposal for the dissolution of a district, as described, if the commission approves, adopts, or accepts a specified study that includes a finding, based on a preponderance of the evidence, that, among other things, the district has one or more documented chronic service provision deficiencies, the district spent public funds in an unlawful or reckless manner, or the district has shown willful neglect by failing to consistently adhere to the California Public Records Act. The bill would require the commission to adopt a resolution of intent to initiate a dissolution based on these provisions and to provide a remediation period of at least 12 months, during which the district may take steps to remedy the stated deficiencies. The bill would authorize the commission, at the conclusion of the remediation period, to find that the district has failed to remedy the deficiencies and adopt a resolution to dissolve the district. With a specified exception, existing law provides for protest proceedings for a change of organization or reorganization following adoption of a resolution making certain determinations by the commission, as provided. Existing law sets forth required procedures for the commission following a protest hearing depending on the nature of the conducting authority, as defined, the type of change of organization or reorganization, and the results of the protest proceeding. The bill would reorganize and consolidate the above-described procedures. The bill would make conforming changes and remove obsolete provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
May 2022
Senate Passage
Apr 2022
Assembly Passage
Jun 2022
Signed into Law
Jul 2022
Introduced Feb 8, 2022
Signed Jul 1, 2022
Floor votes · Senate Apr 25, 2022 · Assembly Jun 16, 2022
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 37
Apr 25, 2022
D
Democratic29
100% Yea
R
Republican8
75% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
9
Committee
2
Amendments
7
Jul 1, 2022
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 23, 2022
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4393.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jun 16, 2022
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 16, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 5396.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Jun 9, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Jun 8, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 8).
lower
May 5, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 25, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 3495.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 4, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Mar 31, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3292.) (March 31).
upper
Mar 24, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 16, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 8, 2022
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Robert M. Hertzberg
DDemocratic
Co
Cecilia Aguiar-Curry
DDemocratic
Co
Chad Mayes
IIndependent
Co
Dave Cortese
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 938
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 938. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline