Toxicological testing on dogs and cats.
Summary
Existing law prohibits manufacturers and contract testing facilities from using traditional animal test methods within the state for which an appropriate alternative test method has been scientifically validated and recommended by the Inter-Agency Coordinating Committee for the Validation of Alternative Methods and adopted, as specified. Existing law exempts certain animal tests from these provisions, including animal tests performed for the purpose of medical research. Existing law provides that the exclusive remedy for a violation of these provisions is a civil action for injunctive relief brought by, among others, the Attorney General and makes a violation of these provisions punishable by a specified civil penalty. This bill would, in addition, prohibit a contract testing facility from conducting a canine or feline toxicological experiment, defined as any test or study of any duration that seeks to determine the effect of the application or exposure of any amount of a chemical substance on a dog or cat, unless the experiment is conducted for specified purposes. The bill would authorize the Attorney General, the district attorney of the county in which the violation is alleged to have occurred, or the city attorney in certain instances to bring a civil action for a violation of these provisions, punishable by a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000 for each day that each dog or cat is used in a canine or feline toxicological experiment.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2022
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Senate Passage
May 2022
Assembly Passage
Aug 2022
Signed into Law
Sep 2022
Introduced Jan 26, 2022
Signed Sep 26, 2022
Floor votes · Senate May 26, 2022 · Assembly Aug 18, 2022
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
May 26, 2022
D
Democratic31
96% Yea
R
Republican9
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
11
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Sep 26, 2022
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 18, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 5933.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 11, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (August 11).
lower
Jun 14, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 2, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 26, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 3983.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 19, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 19, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3773.) (May 19).
upper
Apr 18, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 13, 2022
Upper · Passed
April 18 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 30, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 3254.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 21, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 2, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 26, 2022
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Scott Wiener
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 879
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 879. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline