Excluded employees: binding arbitration.
Summary
Existing law, the Bill of Rights for State Excluded Employees, permits, among other things, excluded employee organizations to represent their excluded members in their employment relations, including grievances, with the state. That law defines excluded employees as all managerial employees, confidential employees, supervisory employees, and specified employees of the Department of Personnel Administration, the Department of Finance, the Controller's office, the Legislative Counsel Bureau, the Bureau of State Audits, the Public Employment Relations Board, the Department of Industrial Relations, and the State Athletic Commission. This bill would enact the Excluded Employee Arbitration Act to permit an employee organization that represents an excluded employee who has filed certain grievances with the Department of Human Resources to request binding arbitration of the grievance if specified conditions are met. The bill would require the designation of a standing panel of arbitrators and, under specified circumstances, the provision of arbitrators from the California State Mediation and Conciliation Service within the Public Employment Relations Board. The bill would then require the arbitrator to be chosen in a specified manner and would prescribe the duties of that arbitrator. This bill would grant a party to the arbitration the right to have a certified shorthand reporter transcribe the proceeding and would deem the transcription the official record of the proceeding. The bill would require a nonprevailing party, other than an excluded employee, to bear the costs of arbitration and would prohibit passing the costs of arbitration on to the excluded employee. The bill would repeal its provisions on January 1, 2027.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2020
Committee Review
Aug 2021
Senate Passage
Jun 2021
Assembly Passage
Sep 2021
Vetoed
Jan 2022
Introduced Dec 15, 2020
Vetoed Jan 27, 2022
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2021 · Assembly Sep 7, 2021
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 37
Jun 1, 2021
D
Democratic29
100% Yea
R
Republican8
87% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Jan 27, 2022
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Oct 7, 2021
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 7, 2021
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 7, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 2818.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 26, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (August 26).
lower
Jul 7, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 24, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 10, 2021
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P.E. & R. and JUD.
lower
Jun 1, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1341.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 20, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1182.) (May 20).
upper
Apr 21, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 858.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 6, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 670.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 22, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
Mar 11, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and JUD.
upper
Mar 3, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 28, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Dec 15, 2020
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Nielsen
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 76
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 76. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline