Civil actions: forcible entry, forcible detainer, or unlawful detainer.
Summary
Existing law governs the procedure relating to an action for forcible entry, forcible detainer, or unlawful detainer, and provides for specific timelines regarding the filing of a complaint and the defendant's response. Existing law authorizes a defendant, on or before the day fixed for the defendant's appearance, to appear and answer or demur in those specified actions. Existing law authorizes a party to move for summary judgment at any time after the answer is filed upon giving 5 days notice. This bill would also authorize a defendant to file a motion to strike on or before the day fixed for the defendant's appearance. The bill would authorize a party to file a motion for summary adjudication in the same manner as a motion for summary judgment.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2021
Last action Feb 1, 2022
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Apr 22, 2021
Upper · Passed
April 27 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 3, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 19, 2021
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Patricia C. Bates
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 676
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 676. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline