SB 545 California Senate · 2021-2022 Regular Session

Pupil retention: COVID-19 impact.

Summary
Existing law requires the governing board of each school district and each county board of education to approve a policy regarding the promotion and retention of pupils between specified grades, and requires that policy to provide for the identification of pupils who should be retained or who are at risk of being retained in their current grade level on the basis of specified factors. Existing law requires that the policy provide for parental notification when a pupil is identified as being at risk of retention, and that the policy provide the pupil's parent or guardian the opportunity to consult with the teacher or teachers responsible for the decision to promote or retain the pupil. Existing law also requires, under specified circumstances, that the pupil's parent or guardian be provided the opportunity to discuss a teacher's recommendation with the teacher and the principal before any final determination of pupil retention or promotion is made. Existing law requires a pupil to be promoted or retained only as provided for in those policies. This bill would require school districts, upon receiving a request from a pupil's parent to retain the pupil for the 2021–22 school year, to offer to the pupil specified interventions and supports, offer to the pupil access to prior semester courses in which the pupil received a D or F letter grade or offer some other form of credit recovery, and provide to the parent information, made available by the State Department of Education, about research on the effects of pupil retention, and the types of interventions and supports that have been shown to be beneficial to pupils. The bill would require the department to compile existing research on the effects of pupil retention on future academic outcomes, and on other outcomes as determined by the department, for pupils who were retained, and on the types of interventions and supports that have been shown to be beneficial to pupils. The bill would require the department to make this information available on its internet website commencing on or before August 1, 2021. By imposing new duties on school districts, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Jun 2021
Senate Passage
Jun 2021
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2021 Last action Jun 10, 2021
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2021

How they voted

39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Jun 1, 2021
D Democratic31
31 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican9
8 Yea 1
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
18
Key actions
4
Committee
3
Amendments
2
Jun 10, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jun 1, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1346.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 20, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1196.) (May 20).
upper
Apr 15, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 14, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 794.) (April 14).
upper
Mar 3, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 18, 2021
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Scott Wilk
Scott Wilk
RRepublican
CA
21