Protective orders: reproductive coercion.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Domestic Violence Prevention Act for the purpose of preventing acts of domestic violence, abuse, and sexual abuse and providing for a separation of the persons involved in the domestic violence for a period sufficient to enable those persons to seek a resolution of the causes of the violence. Existing law authorizes a court to issue a protective order enjoining a party from engaging in specified acts, including threatening or harassing the other party or disturbing the peace of the other party. Existing law defines "disturbing the peace of the other party" as conduct that destroys the mental or emotional calm of the other party, including coercive control, which is a pattern of behavior that unreasonably interferes with a person's free will and personal liberty and includes, among other things, unreasonably isolating a victim from friends, relatives, or other sources of support. A knowing and intentional violation of a protective order is punishable as a misdemeanor. This bill would add engaging in reproductive coercion, as described, to the definition of disturbing the peace of the other party. Because a violation of a protective order is punishable as a crime, by expanding the bases for the issuance of these orders, this bill would expand an existing crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Jun 2021
Senate Passage
Apr 2021
Assembly Passage
Jul 2021
Signed into Law
Jul 2021
Introduced Feb 10, 2021
Signed Jul 23, 2021
Floor votes · Senate Apr 29, 2021 · Assembly Jul 12, 2021
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 37
Apr 29, 2021
D
Democratic29
89% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
10
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Jul 23, 2021
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 12, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 56. Noes 0. Page 2312.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Jun 30, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 30).
lower
Jun 8, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (June 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 13, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 29, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 971.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 20, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
Apr 5, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Mar 24, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 591.) (March 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 15, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 5, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 17, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 10, 2021
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 374
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 374. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline