Wildlife: Big Game Management Account: uses.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Big Game Management Account within the Fish and Game Preservation Fund. Existing law requires revenue from the sale of tags for antelope, elk, deer, wild pig, bear, and sheep to be deposited into the account, except as provided. Existing law requires funds deposited into the account to be expended, upon appropriation by the Legislature, by the Department of Fish and Wildlife, solely for specified purposes and pursuant to specified limitations. Existing law authorizes the department to make grants to, reimburse, or enter into contracts or other agreements with nonprofit organizations for the use of the funds from the account to carry out those purposes, including related habitat conservation projects. This bill instead would authorize the department to make grants to, reimburse, or enter into contracts or other agreements with public and private entities, including nonprofit organizations, and federally recognized Indian tribes for the use of the funds from the account to carry out those purposes. The bill would require the department, in acting pursuant to that authorization, to consider the state's biodiversity goals.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Jun 2022
Senate Passage
Jan 2022
Assembly Passage
Jun 2022
Signed into Law
Jul 2022
Introduced Feb 10, 2021
Signed Jul 19, 2022
Floor votes · Senate Jan 6, 2022 · Assembly Jun 30, 2022
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 37
Jan 6, 2022
D
Democratic29
75% Yea
R
Republican8
87% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
10
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Jul 19, 2022
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 30, 2022
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (75-0-2)
assembly
Jun 29, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 5639.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Jun 22, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 22).
lower
Jun 14, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on W.,P., & W.
lower
Jan 6, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 0. Page 2723.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 17, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Apr 28, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 27, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 938.) (April 27).
upper
Apr 15, 2021
Upper · Passed
April 15 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 17, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Feb 10, 2021
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Dodd
DDemocratic
Co
Brian Jones
RRepublican
Co
Dave Cortese
DDemocratic
Co
Devon Mathis
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 370
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 370. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline