Victim compensation: use of force by a law enforcement officer.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the compensation of victims and derivative victims of specified types of crimes by the California Victim Compensation Board from the Restitution Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, for specified losses suffered as a result of those crimes. Existing law defines various terms for purposes of these provisions. This bill would define "law enforcement officer" consistently with specified provisions. The bill would define "victim services provider" to mean an individual, whether paid or serving as a volunteer, who provides services to victims under the supervision of either an agency or organization that has a documented record of providing services to victims, or a law enforcement or prosecution agency. (2) Existing law requires that a person be ineligible for compensation under specified conditions, including, among other things, if the board determines that denial of the claim for compensation is appropriate because of the nature of the victim's involvement in the events leading to the crime or the involvement of the person whose injury or death gives rise to the application. Existing law requires the board to deny an application if it finds that the victim failed to cooperate reasonably with a law enforcement agency in the apprehension and conviction of a criminal committing the crime. This bill, in the case of a claim based on a victim's serious bodily injury or death that resulted from a law enforcement officer's use of force, would prohibit the board from denying an application based on the victim's or other applicant's involvement in the crime, except as specified, or the victim's failure to cooperate. The bill would require the board, solely for the purposes of eligibility for compensation, to accept as sufficient evidence forms of documentation, as described, that describe or demonstrate a person suffered serious bodily injury or death as a result of a law enforcement officer's use of force. The bill, in the case of a claim based on a victim's death as a result of a crime, would prohibit the board from denying an application based on the deceased victim's involvement in the crime or the victim's or derivative victim's failure to cooperate, except as provided. By expanding the types of crime for which compensation can be paid from a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. (3) Existing law requires that the California Victim Compensation Board be subrogated to the rights of the recipient to the extent of any compensation granted by the board. This bill would specify that the above-described subrogation of the board applies to compensation by the board for a claim based on serious bodily injury or death that resulted from a law enforcement officer's use of force, as specified.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Jun 2021
Senate Passage
Jun 2021
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 3, 2021
Last action Aug 31, 2022
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2021
How they voted
30–5
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 37
Jun 2, 2021
D
Democratic29
100% Yea
R
Republican8
62% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
35
Key actions
12
Committee
4
Amendments
10
Aug 23, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Sep 1, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 30, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 26, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (August 26).
lower
Jul 5, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 1, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 29).
lower
Jun 10, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 2, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 6. Page 1385.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 20, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 20, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1187.) (May 20).
upper
Apr 14, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 778.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 25, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 18, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 4, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 10, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 3, 2021
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 8 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 299
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 299. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline