Property taxation: active solar energy systems: partnership flip transactions.
Summary
The California Constitution generally limits the maximum rate of ad valorem tax on real property to 1% of the full cash value of the property and defines "full cash value" for these purposes as the appraised value of real property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in ownership has occurred after the 1975 assessment. Pursuant to constitutional authorization, existing property tax law excludes from the definition of "newly constructed" for these purposes the construction or addition of any active solar energy system, as defined, through the 2023–24 fiscal year. Under existing property tax law, this exclusion remains in effect only until there is a subsequent change in ownership, but an active solar energy system that qualifies for the exclusion before January 1, 2025, will continue to receive the exclusion until there is a subsequent change in ownership. This bill would provide that for a legal entity that owns an active solar energy system pursuant to a partnership flip transaction, as defined, neither an initial transfer of a capital and profits interest in the legal entity, nor any subsequent change in the allocation of the capital and profits of the legal entity among the members, shall be deemed to constitute a transfer of control of, or of a majority interest in, the legal entity. The bill would provide that if the parties to a partnership flip transaction sell or exchange ownership of the partnership or limited liability company in a transaction or series of transactions, that are separate and apart from the partnership flip transaction conducted pursuant to the bill's provisions, in such a manner that a change in ownership of the partnership or limited liability company occurs, as specified, then the bill's provisions do not apply to that transaction or transactions. The bill would make related findings and declarations. By adding to the duties of county assessors in applying this exclusion, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2021
Committee Review
Aug 2021
Senate Passage
Apr 2021
Assembly Passage
Sep 2021
Signed into Law
Sep 2021
Introduced Jan 28, 2021
Signed Sep 30, 2021
Floor votes · Senate Apr 8, 2021 · Assembly Sep 1, 2021
How they voted
34–2
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
Apr 8, 2021
D
Democratic31
90% Yea
R
Republican9
66% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
12
Committee
8
Amendments
4
Sep 30, 2021
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 2, 2021
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 33. Noes 4. Page 2351.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 1, 2021
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 1, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 72. Noes 1. Page 2601.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 26, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (August 26).
lower
Aug 16, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 6, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 24, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Jun 21, 2021
Lower · Passed
June 21 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 13, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Apr 8, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 2. Page 714.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 5, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Mar 22, 2021
Upper · Passed
March 22 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 11, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 479.) (March 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 10, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jan 28, 2021
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Robert M. Hertzberg
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 267
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 267. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline