Property taxation: welfare exemption: low-income housing.
Summary
The California Constitution authorizes the Legislature to exempt from taxation, in whole or in part, property that is used exclusively for religious, hospital, or charitable purposes, and is owned or held in trust by a nonprofit entity. Pursuant to this constitutional authority, existing law partially exempts from property taxation property used exclusively for rental housing and related facilities, if specified criteria are met, including, except in the case of a limited partnership in which the managing general partner is a nonprofit corporation eligible for the exemption, that 90% or more of the occupants of the property are lower income households whose rents do not exceed the rent limits prescribed by a specified law. Existing law limits the total exemption amount allowed to a taxpayer, with respect to a single property or multiple properties for any fiscal year on the sole basis of the application of this criterion, to $20,000,000 of assessed value. This bill would remove the above-described limit on the total exemption amount with respect to property tax lien dates occurring on and after the effective date of the bill. By adding to the duties of local tax officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Jun 2022
Senate Passage
May 2022
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2022
Last action Jun 20, 2022
Floor votes · Senate May 25, 2022
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
May 25, 2022
D
Democratic31
96% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
5
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Jun 2, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
May 25, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 3937.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 19, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3797.) (May 19).
upper
Apr 20, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3460.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 13, 2022
Upper · Passed
April 21 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 31, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Mar 17, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 18, 2022
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Henry Stern
DDemocratic
Co
Anthony Portantino
DDemocratic
Co
Cristina Garcia
DDemocratic
Co
Kevin Mullin
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1456
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1456. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline