Address confidentiality: public entity employees and contractors.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes reproductive health care service providers, employees, volunteers, and patients to complete an application to be approved by the Secretary of State for the purposes of enabling state and local agencies to respond to requests for public records without disclosing a program participant's residence address contained in any public record and otherwise provide for confidentiality of identity for that person, subject to specified conditions. Existing law requires an applicant seeking address confidentiality under this program due to their affiliation with a reproductive health care services facility to provide a certified statement signed by a person authorized by the reproductive health care services facility stating that the facility or any of its providers, employees, volunteers, or patients is or was the target of threats or acts of violence within one year of the date of the application. Under existing law, any person who makes a false statement in an application is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would authorize an applicant seeking address confidentiality under this program to submit a certified statement by the employee, patient, or volunteer for a reproductive health care services facility that they have been the target of threats, harassment, or acts of violence, or a workplace violence restraining order issued because of threats or acts of violence connected with a reproductive health care services facility, as specified, instead of a certified statement from a representative of the reproductive health care services facility. This bill would also expand the address confidentiality program to include other individuals who face threats of violence or violence or harassment from the public because of their work for a public entity. The bill would require an individual seeking to make their address confidential under these provisions to complete the application in person at a community-based assistance program designated by the Secretary of State. The bill would require the application process to include a requirement that the applicant meet with a counselor and receive orientation information about the program. By imposing new duties on local public officials and expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law permits an individual to seek confidential voter status and have their residence address, telephone number, and email address declared confidential upon presentation of certification that the person is a participant in among other programs, the Address Confidentiality for Reproductive Health Care Service Providers, Employees, Volunteers, and Patients program. This bill would include individuals who work for a public entity and who participate in the expanded address confidentiality program described above within the category of people eligible for confidential voter status. (3) Existing law requires an election official to post a list of all polling places and precinct board members at specified times before an election. Existing law requires this list to be posted at the elections official's office and on their official website. Existing law requires an election official to include the political party affiliation for each listed precinct board member. This bill would eliminate the requirement to post the names of the precinct board members, but would still require the election official to post the political party preference for all precinct board members, as specified. (4) Existing law requires a county elections official, upon application of a public safety officer and if authorized by the county board of supervisors, to make confidential an officer's residence address, telephone number, and email address appearing on the affidavit of registration, as specified. Under existing law, an application for confidential voter status is required to contain a statement, signed under penalty of perjury, that the person is a public safety officer and that a life-threatening circumstance exists to the officer or a member of the officer's family, as specified. This bill would create a similar program for qualified workers, as defined, that includes a requirement to submit an application, signed under penalty of perjury, that they are a qualified worker and that a life-threatening circumstance exists to the worker or members of the worker's family. By creating a new crime, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Secretary of State to submit an annual report to the Legislature that includes the total number of applications received for the program, the number of program participants within each county, and any allegations of misuse of the program relating to election purposes, as specified. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. (6) Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. (7) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Senate Passage
May 2022
Assembly Passage
Aug 2022
Signed into Law
Sep 2022
Introduced Feb 16, 2022
Signed Sep 26, 2022
Floor votes · Senate May 25, 2022 · Assembly Aug 22, 2022
How they voted
28–7
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 37
May 25, 2022
D
Democratic29
96% Yea
R
Republican8
87% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
38
Key actions
19
Committee
8
Amendments
12
Sep 26, 2022
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2022
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 3. Page 5388.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 24, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 5108.)
upper
Aug 23, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 4961.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Aug 23, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).
upper
Aug 22, 2022
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 22, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 62. Noes 0. Page 6027.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 15, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 11, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 2.) (August 11).
lower
Jun 28, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 23, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 16, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 15, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 15).
lower
Jun 2, 2022
Committee
Referred to Coms. on ELECTIONS and JUD.
lower
May 25, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 3906.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 19, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3784.) (May 19).
upper
Apr 27, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 2. Page 3513.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 18, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 4, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 31, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3237.) (March 28).
upper
Mar 17, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Mar 15, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Feb 23, 2022
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E. & C.A. and JUD.
upper
Feb 16, 2022
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Josh Newman
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1131
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1131. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline