Open meetings: orderly conduct.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Ralph M. Brown Act, requires, with specified exceptions, that all meetings of a legislative body of a local agency, as those terms are defined, be open and public and that all persons be permitted to attend and participate. Existing law requires every agenda for regular meetings of a local agency to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the legislative body on any item of interest to the public, before or during the legislative body's consideration of the item, that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body. Existing law authorizes the legislative body to adopt reasonable regulations to ensure that the intent of the provisions relating to this public comment requirement is carried out, including, but not limited to, regulations limiting the total amount of time allocated for public testimony on particular issues and for each individual speaker. Existing law authorizes the members of the legislative body conducting the meeting to order the meeting room cleared and continue in session, as prescribed, if a group or groups have willfully interrupted the orderly conduct of a meeting and order cannot be restored by the removal of individuals who are willfully interrupting the meeting. This bill would authorize the presiding member of the legislative body conducting a meeting or their designee to remove, or cause the removal of, an individual for disrupting the meeting. The bill, except as provided, would require removal to be preceded by a warning to the individual by the presiding member of the legislative body or their designee that the individual's behavior is disrupting the meeting and that the individual's failure to cease their behavior may result in their removal. The bill would authorize the presiding member or their designee to then remove the individual if the individual does not promptly cease their disruptive behavior. The bill would define "disrupting" for this purpose. (2) Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. (3) The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Jun 2022
Senate Passage
May 2022
Assembly Passage
Aug 2022
Signed into Law
Aug 2022
Introduced Feb 16, 2022
Signed Aug 22, 2022
Floor votes · Senate May 2, 2022 · Assembly Aug 1, 2022
How they voted
27–7
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 37
May 2, 2022
D
Democratic29
93% Yea
R
Republican8
87% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
13
Committee
4
Amendments
9
Aug 22, 2022
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 4, 2022
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 28. Noes 9. Page 4655.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 1, 2022
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 1, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 57. Noes 18. Page 5712.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Jun 21, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (June 21).
lower
Jun 16, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 15). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 6, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
May 5, 2022
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and JUD.
lower
May 2, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 7. Page 3580.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 21, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Apr 20, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 2. Page 3436.) (April 19).
upper
Apr 7, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 21, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 17, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 3149.) (March 17).
upper
Mar 9, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 23, 2022
Committee
Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and JUD.
upper
Feb 16, 2022
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Dave Cortese
DDemocratic
Co
Cecilia Aguiar-Curry
DDemocratic
Co
Evan Low
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1100
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1100. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline