School curriculum: parental review.
Summary
Existing law requires all primary supplemental instructional materials and assessments, including textbooks, teacher's manuals, films, audio and video recordings, and software, to be compiled and stored by the classroom instructor and made available promptly for inspection by a parent or guardian, as provided. This bill would require a classroom instructor to also provide a parent or a guardian with a copy of the classroom instructor's lesson plan, as defined, upon request, in hard copy or electronic word processor document format, at the parent or guardian's choosing, as provided. By imposing additional duties on classroom instructors, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize school officials to charge for the lesson plan an amount not to exceed the cost of duplication. Existing law requires the curriculum, including titles, descriptions, and instructional aims of every course offered by a public school, to be compiled at least once annually in a prospectus, and requires each schoolsite to make its prospectus available for review upon request, as provided. This bill would require each schoolsite to also publish the prospectus on its internet website, if it maintains an internet website, at least 3 calendar days before the start of the academic year, and would require any changes to the school's prospectus to be reflected on the school's internet website no later than 7 calendar days after the change has been made. To the extent these provisions impose additional requirements on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
died
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 15, 2022
Last action Apr 27, 2022
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
1
Committee
3
Amendments
1
Apr 27, 2022
Committee
April 27 set for second hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 5. Page 3539.) Reconsideration granted.
upper
Mar 23, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Mar 14, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 23, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 15, 2022
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Melissa A. Melendez
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1045
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1045. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline