Law enforcement agencies: radio communications.
Summary
Existing law establishes the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) to make specified criminal justice databases, including individual criminal histories, wanted and missing persons, and stolen firearms, vehicles, and property, available to participating law enforcement agencies. Existing law prohibits unauthorized access to CLETS and the unlawful use of CLETS information by authorized users. Existing law authorizes the Attorney General to adopt policies, procedures, and practices related to the use of CLETS. These rules require a participating agency to restrict access to CLETS and define "access" as the ability to see or hear any information obtained from CLETS. This bill would require a law enforcement agency, including the California Highway Patrol, municipal police departments, county sheriff's departments, specified local law enforcement agencies, and specified university and college police departments, to, by no later than January 1, 2024, ensure public access to the radio communications of that agency, as specified. This bill would also require those law enforcement agencies to ensure that any criminal justice information or personally identifiable information obtained through CLETS is not broadcast in a manner that is accessible to the public, as specified. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Senate Passage
May 2022
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2022
Last action Aug 11, 2022
Floor votes · Senate May 26, 2022
How they voted
23–7
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 37
May 26, 2022
D
Democratic29
79% Yea
R
Republican8
75% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Aug 11, 2022
Lower · Passed
August 11 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jun 21, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 2, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 26, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 25. Noes 8. Page 3967.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 19, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 19, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3778.) (May 19).
upper
Apr 19, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 3440.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 23, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 16, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 23, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 14, 2022
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Josh Becker
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1000
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1000. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline