Peace officers: law enforcement gangs.
Summary
Existing laws defines those persons who are peace officers, the entities authorized to appoint them, and the scope of their authority. Existing law prescribes certain minimum standards for a person to be appointed as a peace officer, including training requirements, moral character, and physical and mental condition, and certain disqualifying factors for a person to be employed as a peace officer, including a felony conviction. Existing law requires a department or agency that employs peace officers to establish a procedure to investigate complaints by members of the public against those officers. This bill would define a law enforcement gang, a group of law enforcement officers within an agency that engages in a pattern of specified unlawful or unethical on-duty behavior, and would require law enforcement agencies to have a policy prohibiting law enforcement gangs and making participation, as specified, in a law enforcement gang grounds for termination. The bill would require an agency to disclose an officer's termination for involvement in a law enforcement gang to another law enforcement agency conducting a preemployment background investigation of that officer, as specified. By requiring local law enforcement agencies to adopt new policies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Aug 2021
Assembly Passage
May 2021
Senate Passage
Sep 2021
Signed into Law
Sep 2021
Introduced Feb 17, 2021
Signed Sep 30, 2021
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2021 · Assembly May 28, 2021
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 37
Sep 3, 2021
D
Democratic29
93% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
9
Sep 30, 2021
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2021
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2881.).
lower
Sep 3, 2021
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 5 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2392.).
upper
Aug 26, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 26).
upper
Aug 16, 2021
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jul 8, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 7, 2021
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 6).
upper
Jun 9, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 28, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 1. Page 1687.)
lower
May 24, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 20, 2021
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 20).
lower
May 12, 2021
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 3, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 29, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 28, 2021
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Mar 26, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 25, 2021
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 25, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 18, 2021
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Gipson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 958
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 958. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline