Sex offenses: evidence.
Summary
(1) Existing law prohibits, during the prosecution of specified sex crimes, the admission of evidence of the manner in which the victim was dressed, when offered by either the prosecution or the defendant on the issue of consent, unless the court finds the evidence relevant and admissible in the interests of justice. This bill would prohibit the court from admitting evidence, in the above circumstances, of the manner in which the victim was dressed, upon a finding that the evidence is relevant and admissible in the interests of justice. (2) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1103 of the Evidence Code proposed by AB 1171 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1171 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (3) The California Constitution provides that relevant evidence shall not be excluded in any criminal proceeding except as provided by statute enacted by a 23 vote of the membership of each house of the Legislature. Because this bill would limit the admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings, it would require a 23 vote.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Jul 2021
Assembly Passage
May 2021
Senate Passage
Sep 2021
Signed into Law
Oct 2021
Introduced Feb 17, 2021
Signed Oct 5, 2021
Floor votes · Senate Sep 8, 2021 · Assembly May 24, 2021
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 37
Sep 8, 2021
D
Democratic29
93% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
10
Committee
7
Amendments
5
Oct 5, 2021
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2021
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 2976.).
lower
Sep 8, 2021
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 8, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2516.).
upper
Sep 3, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jul 14, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 13).
upper
Jun 3, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 24, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1540.)
lower
May 17, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1428.)
lower
Apr 28, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 20, 2021
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 22, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 18, 2021
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 18, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 18, 2021
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 27 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Sabrina Cervantes
DDemocratic
Co
Akilah Weber Pierson
DDemocratic
Co
Anna Caballero
DDemocratic
Co
Autumn R. Burke
DDemocratic
Co
Blanca Rubio
DDemocratic
Co
Buffy Wicks
DDemocratic
Co
Cecilia Aguiar-Curry
DDemocratic
Co
Chris Ward
DDemocratic
Co
Cottie Petrie-Norris
DDemocratic
Co
Cristina Garcia
DDemocratic
Co
Eloise Reyes
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 939
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 939. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline