Department of Motor Vehicles: records: pull-notice system.
Summary
Existing law requires a prospective employer of a driver of specified vehicles, such as a permitted taxicab, to obtain a report from the Department of Motor Vehicles that shows the driver's current public record. Existing law requires an employer of a driver who drives a specified vehicle to participate in a pull-notice system, which is a process for the purpose of providing the employer with a report showing the driver's current public record, and any subsequent convictions, failures to appear, accidents, driver's license suspensions, driver's license revocations, or any other actions taken against the driving privilege or certificate, added to the driver's record while the employer's notification request remains valid and has not been canceled. Existing law also requires the employer of the driver to obtain a periodic report from the department at least every 12 months. A violation of these provisions is a crime. This bill would expand the applicability of these provisions, including the pull-notice system, to include drivers of vehicles operated in the service of a delivery network company, a transportation network company, a charter-party carrier, as defined, or operated for compensation in fulfillment of deliveries, as defined. By expanding the class of drivers subject to these provisions, this bill would expand the scope of an existing crime and create a state-mandated local program. The bill would also establish that a prospective employee's consent allowing an employer to obtain an initial report is sufficient for the continued monitoring of that driver's record under the pull-notice system. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Jun 2022
Assembly Passage
Jan 2022
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 12, 2021
Last action Jun 14, 2022
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 27, 2022
How they voted
61–0
Passed · 15 other
Total votes 76
Jan 27, 2022
D
Democratic56
83% Yea
I
Independent1
0% Nay
R
Republican19
73% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Jun 14, 2022
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 4, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
upper
Jan 27, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 61. Noes 0. Page 3409.)
lower
Jan 20, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (January 20).
lower
May 11, 2021
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 27, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 15, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 25, 2021
Committee
Referred to Coms. on C. & C. and TRANS.
lower
Feb 13, 2021
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 15.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Cooper
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 660
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 660. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline