Department of Fish and Wildlife: Office of the Ombudsperson.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Department of Fish and Wildlife, which is administered through the Director of Fish and Wildlife. Existing law vests the department with jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species. The California Constitution establishes the 5-member Fish and Game Commission, with members appointed by the Governor and approved by the Senate. Existing law requires the commissioners to annually elect one of their number as president. Existing law requires the commission to formulate the general policies for the conduct of the department and requires the director to be guided by those policies and be responsible to the commission for the administration of the department in accordance with those policies. This bill would establish in the department the Office of the Ombudsperson, administered through the ombudsperson. The bill would require the commission to appoint the ombudsperson and would require the office to operate independently of department staff and to report to the president of the commission. The bill would require the office to undertake specified duties under the supervision of the president of the commission, including working independently as an intermediary to provide individuals with a confidential process to address complaints regarding the department and resolve disputes with the department. The bill would require information provided to the ombudsperson pursuant to the confidential process to be protected as confidential and to be exempt from public disclosure, including, but not limited to, disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 10, 2021
Last action Feb 1, 2022
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Feb 1, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 20, 2021
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Apr 28, 2021
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 12, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 5.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 18, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on W.,P., & W.
lower
Feb 11, 2021
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Devon Mathis
RRepublican
Co
James Gallagher
RRepublican
Co
Steve Choi
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 554
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 554. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline