Enhanced infrastructure financing districts: public financing authority: members: joint powers authorities.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a city or a county to designate a proposed enhanced infrastructure financing district, with a governing body referred to as the public financing authority, by adopting a resolution of intention to establish the proposed district and requires the public financing authority to direct the preparation of and adopt an infrastructure financing plan and adopt a resolution to form the district, as provided. Existing law provides for the participation of an affected taxing entity, as defined, in the district, other than a county office of education, school district, or community college district. Existing law requires that the public financing authority include a majority of members from the legislative body of each participating affected taxing entity and 2 members of the public chosen by the legislative bodies of those participating affected taxing entities, as provided. Existing law, the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, generally authorizes 2 or more public agencies, by agreement, to jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties, as specified. Existing law authorizes the agreement to set forth the manner by which the joint powers authority will be governed. This bill would specify that any member of the legislative body of a participating affected taxing entity who serves as a member of the public financing authority of an enhanced infrastructure financing district, as described above, may also serve as a member of the governing body of an agency or entity formed pursuant to an agreement for the joint exercise of power that the participating affected taxing entity has entered into in accordance with the Joint Exercise of Powers Act.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2021
Committee Review
Jun 2021
Assembly Passage
Apr 2021
Senate Passage
Jun 2021
Signed into Law
Jun 2021
Introduced Jan 27, 2021
Signed Jun 28, 2021
Floor votes · Senate Jun 17, 2021 · Assembly Apr 8, 2021
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Jun 17, 2021
D
Democratic31
93% Yea
R
Republican9
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Jun 28, 2021
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 17, 2021
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 17, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1544.).
upper
Jun 10, 2021
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 10).
upper
May 12, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Apr 8, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 932.)
lower
Mar 25, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 24).
lower
Feb 12, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jan 28, 2021
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 27.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CV
Carlos Villapudua
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 336
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 336. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline