Bay Area Air Quality Management District: district board: compensation.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, which is vested with the authority to regulate air emissions located in the boundaries of the Counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara and portions of the Counties of Solano and Sonoma. Existing law establishes a district board to govern the district and prescribes the membership of the district board. Existing law authorizes the district board to provide, by ordinance, compensation not to exceed $100 per day for board members for attending meetings of the board or committees of the board or while on official business of the district and not to exceed $6,000 per year. Existing law also requires board members to receive actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their duties. This bill would revise the amount of compensation that a member of the board may receive for attending a meeting of the board or attending a meeting while on official business of the district to an amount not to exceed $100 per meeting and $200 per day. The bill would also authorize a member of the board to receive compensation for active transportation travel to one of these meetings and would subject this compensation to the $6,000 total annual compensation limit.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Jun 2022
Assembly Passage
Apr 2022
Senate Passage
Aug 2022
Signed into Law
Sep 2022
Introduced Feb 18, 2022
Signed Sep 23, 2022
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2022 · Assembly Apr 18, 2022
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Aug 22, 2022
D
Democratic31
100% Yea
R
Republican9
66% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
5
Sep 23, 2022
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2022
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 6067.).
lower
Aug 22, 2022
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 22, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4943.).
upper
Aug 1, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jun 30, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 1, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 1). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 4, 2022
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and GOV. & F.
upper
Apr 18, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 67. Noes 3. Page 4259.)
lower
Apr 5, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 4).
lower
Mar 14, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 10, 2022
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 10, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 19, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
Feb 18, 2022
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Alex Lee
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2721
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2721. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline