Water: judges and adjudications.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes the Judicial Council to conduct institutes and seminars for the purpose of orienting judges to new judicial assignments, keeping them informed concerning new developments in the law, and promoting uniformity in judicial procedure, as specified. This bill would authorize the Judicial Council, on or before January 1, 2025, to establish a program that provides training and education to judges in specified actions relating to water, as defined. The bill would provide that the program may be funded by an appropriation from the General Fund in the annual Budget Act or another statute, or by using existing funds for judicial training. The bill would require a court to prioritize assigning a judge with training or education under the program for actions relating to water, if certain conditions are met. (2) Under existing law, when it appears to the court at any time before or during the trial of the action that expert evidence is or may be required by the court or by any party to the action, the court, on its own motion or on motion of any party, may appoint one or more experts to investigate, to render a report, and to testify as an expert at the trial of the action, as specified. For comprehensive groundwater adjudications, existing law authorizes the court to appoint one or more special masters with specified duties, including, among others, investigating technical and legal issues and performing other tasks the court may deem appropriate. Existing law requires the court to equitably allocate payment of the special master's compensation among the parties and authorizes the court to waive a party's obligations to pay the special master's compensation upon a showing of good cause. This bill would require the Judicial Council to identify experts in water science or management, or research attorneys, who may be available to any judge adjudicating an action relating to water, as defined, as an expert pursuant to the procedure specified above, as a research attorney, or to consult on the contents of a document submitted by a party. The bill would authorize the Judicial Council to pay or reimburse courts for the costs of employing or contracting with those experts or research attorneys in an action relating to water with funds appropriated for that purpose. The bill would authorize a judge to appoint a qualified special master to assist the judge with an action relating to water with duties similar to those for special masters in comprehensive groundwater adjudications. The bill would require the reasonable and appropriate compensation for experts and research attorneys identified pursuant to the bill, special masters appointed pursuant to the bill, and for experts appointed to an action relating to water pursuant to the procedure specified above, to be funded by an appropriation from the General Fund in the annual Budget Act or another statute. For a special master in a comprehensive groundwater adjudication, the bill would authorize their compensation to be provided pursuant to the procedures specified above under existing law or by that General Fund appropriation.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Assembly Passage
May 2022
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2022
Last action Aug 11, 2022
Floor votes · Assembly May 23, 2022
How they voted
74–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 78
May 23, 2022
D
Democratic58
93% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican19
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
6
Aug 11, 2022
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 2, 2022
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jun 30, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 29, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 28).
upper
Jun 1, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 23, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 4840.)
lower
May 19, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 19).
lower
May 11, 2022
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Apr 28, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 27, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 26, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Mar 31, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on W.,P., & W.
lower
Mar 30, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 29, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on W.,P., & W. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 29).
lower
Mar 16, 2022
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 3, 2022
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and W.,P., & W.
lower
Feb 17, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Bloom
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2313
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2313. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline