Digital financial asset businesses: regulation.
Summary
Existing law, the Money Transmission Act, generally prohibits a person from engaging in the business of money transmission, as defined, without a license from the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation. This bill, the Digital Financial Assets Law, would, on and after January 1, 2025, prohibit a person from engaging in digital financial asset business activity, or holding itself out as being able to engage in digital financial asset business activity, with or on behalf of a resident unless any of certain criteria are met, including the person is licensed with the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, as prescribed. The bill would define "digital financial asset" to mean a digital representation of value that is used as a medium of exchange, unit of account, or store of value, and that is not legal tender, whether or not denominated in legal tender, except as specified. This bill would, among other things, authorize the department to conduct examinations of a licensee, as prescribed, and would require a licensee to maintain, for all digital financial asset business activity with, or on behalf of, a resident for 5 years after the date of the activity, certain records, including a general ledger posted at least monthly that lists all assets, liabilities, capital, income, and expenses of the licensee. This bill would authorize the department to take an enforcement measure against a licensee or person that is not a licensee but is engaging in digital financial asset business activity with, or on behalf of, a resident in any of certain instances, including the licensee or person materially violates the provisions of the bill, a rule adopted or order issued under the bill, or a law of this state other than the bill that applies to digital financial asset business activity of the violator with, or on behalf of, a resident. The bill would prescribe certain civil penalties for violations of its provisions. This bill would require a licensee, before engaging in digital financial asset business activity with a resident, to make certain disclosures to the resident, including a schedule of fees and charges the licensee may assess, the manner by which fees and charges will be calculated if they are not set in advance and disclosed, and the timing of the fees and charges. This bill would require an applicant, before submitting an application, to create and, during licensure, maintain in a record policies and procedures for, among other things, an information security program and an operational security program. Existing law, the California Financial Information Privacy Act (CFIPA) , generally regulates the disclosure by a financial institution, as defined, of a consumer's nonpublic personal information. This bill would include a person licensed under its provisions in the definition of "financial institution" and would include digital financial asset business activity in the definition of "financial product or service" for the purposes of the CFIPA.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Assembly Passage
May 2022
Senate Passage
Aug 2022
Vetoed
Sep 2022
Introduced Feb 16, 2022
Vetoed Sep 23, 2022
Floor votes · Senate Aug 29, 2022 · Assembly May 12, 2022
How they voted
29–5
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 37
Aug 29, 2022
D
Democratic29
93% Yea
R
Republican8
62% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
12
Committee
11
Amendments
10
Sep 23, 2022
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 30, 2022
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 71. Noes 0.).
lower
Aug 30, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (August 30).
lower
Aug 29, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 29, 2022
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 29, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 6. Page 5182.).
upper
Aug 22, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 11, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 11, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 2, 2022
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jun 30, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 29, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (June 28).
upper
Jun 27, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 23, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 22).
upper
Jun 15, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
upper
Jun 8, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 6, 2022
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
May 25, 2022
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and PUB. S.
upper
May 12, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 65. Noes 0. Page 4659.)
lower
May 4, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 19, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 21, 2022
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Further hearing to be set.
lower
Mar 3, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Feb 17, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tim Grayson
DDemocratic
Co
Bill Quirk
DDemocratic
Co
Mark Stone
DDemocratic
Co
ML
Monique Limón
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2269
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2269. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline