Peace officers: minimum standards: bias evaluation.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires peace officers in this state to meet specified minimum standards, including, among other requirements, that peace officers be evaluated by a physician and surgeon or psychologist and found to be free from any physical, emotional, or mental condition that might adversely affect the exercise of the powers of a peace officer. This bill would require that evaluation to include bias against race or ethnicity, gender, nationality, religion, disability, or sexual orientation. Under existing law, the minimum education requirement for peace officers is high school graduation from a public school or other accredited high school, passing an equivalency test or high school proficiency examination, or attaining a 2-year, 4-year, or advanced degree from an accredited institution. Existing law requires accreditation to be from a state or local government educational agency, a regional accrediting association, an accrediting association recognized by the United States Department of Education, or an organization holding full membership in specified organizations, including AdvancED. This bill would revise the accreditation standards to include an organization holding full membership in Cognia. (2) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1031 of the Government Code proposed by SB 960 to be operative only if this bill and SB 960 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Jun 2022
Assembly Passage
Apr 2022
Senate Passage
Aug 2022
Signed into Law
Sep 2022
Introduced Feb 15, 2022
Signed Sep 30, 2022
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2022 · Assembly Apr 18, 2022
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
Aug 22, 2022
D
Democratic31
100% Yea
R
Republican9
55% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
9
Committee
5
Amendments
4
Sep 30, 2022
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2022
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 69. Noes 0. Page 6083.).
lower
Aug 22, 2022
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 22, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4954.).
upper
Aug 4, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 2, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 1, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (May 31).
upper
May 4, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 18, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 68. Noes 0. Page 4256.).
lower
Mar 29, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 29).
lower
Feb 24, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 16, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2229
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2229. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline