Gubernatorial recall elections.
Summary
The California Constitution reserves to the electors the power to remove an elective officer by recall election. If a majority of voters in the recall election vote to recall an officer, the officer is removed and the successor candidate who receives a plurality of votes is the successor. Existing law specifies procedures for conducting recall elections, and provides that nominations of candidates to succeed a recalled officer shall be made in the manner prescribed for nominating a candidate to that office in a regular election, except as specified. Those nomination procedures include paying a filing fee for filing a declaration of candidacy, or, alternatively, submitting an in-lieu-filing-fee petition containing a specified number of signatures of registered voters. This bill would instead require, for recall of the Governor, a candidate to succeed the Governor to submit an in-lieu-filing-fee petition, as specified, and would remove the option of paying a filing fee. The bill would require an in-lieu-filing-fee petition to be made available, and would authorize a candidate to begin securing signatures for the petition, when the Secretary of State determines that 50% of the signatures required to qualify the recall petition for an election have been submitted. The bill would require gubernatorial recall elections to instead elect a successor candidate using consensus ranked choice voting, as specified. The bill would specify that the ranked choice voting requirement would become operative only if a specified constitutional amendment is approved by the voters and takes effect. By increasing the duties of local elections officials relative to conducting and tabulating gubernatorial recall elections, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 15, 2022
Last action Apr 27, 2022
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
4
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Apr 27, 2022
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Testimony taken.
lower
Feb 24, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on ELECTIONS.
lower
Feb 16, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
Feb 15, 2022
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Chad Mayes
IIndependent
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2161
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2161. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline