AB 2063 California Assembly · 2021-2022 Regular Session

Density bonuses: affordable housing impact fees.

Summary
Existing law, known as the Density Bonus Law, requires a city or county to provide a developer that proposes a housing development in the city or county with a density bonus and other incentives or concessions for the production of lower income housing units, or for the donation of land within the development, if the developer agrees to, among other things, construct a specified percentage of units for very low income, low-income, or moderate-income households or qualifying residents, including lower income students. Existing law requires the amount of a density bonus and the number of incentives or concessions a qualifying developer receives to be pursuant to a certain formula based on the total number of units in the housing development, as specified. Existing law prohibits affordable housing impact fees, including inclusionary zoning fees and in-lieu fees, from being imposed on a housing development's affordable units. This bill would prohibit affordable housing impact fees, including inclusionary zoning fees and in-lieu fees, from being imposed on a housing development's density bonus units, unless the city, county, or city and county has adopted a local density bonus ordinance or established a local housing program on or before January 1, 2022, that allows for a density bonus of at least 50% for any for-sale or rental housing development containing restricted affordable units that dedicates a specified percentage of units for extremely low, very low, low-, or moderate-income households. By imposing new restrictions on the ability of a local government to impose affordable housing impact fees, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also delete duplicative provisions relating to for-sale units subject to those provisions. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2022 Last action Apr 25, 2022
Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
10
Key actions
0
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Apr 25, 2022
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
Apr 21, 2022
Assembly · Amendment adopted
Read second time and amended.
Apr 20, 2022
Assembly · Amendment offered
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 20).
Apr 6, 2022
Assembly · Reported by committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
Mar 30, 2022
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
Mar 29, 2022
Assembly · Amendment offered
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.
Mar 23, 2022
Assembly · Reported by committee
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
Feb 24, 2022
Assembly · Referred to committee
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and L. GOV.
Feb 15, 2022
Assembly · Reported by committee
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Marc Berman
Marc Berman
DDemocratic
CA
23