School district, county office of education, and community college district employees: personnel commissions: ranked groups.
Summary
Existing law provides for both the adoption and termination of a merit system in a school district or community college district by a majority vote of its classified employees or by a majority of the voting electors of the school district or community college district, as provided. Upon the filing of a petition for the adoption or for the termination of the merit system for classified employees of a school district or community college district, existing law requires the governing board of the district to perform specified activities in response, including activities related to presenting the pros and cons of the issue, providing opportunities for classified personnel to attend meetings, conducting an election by secret ballot, devising an identification system to ensure against fraud in the balloting process, forming a tabulation committee, and providing access to exclusive representatives within the school district, as provided. Existing law requires all vacancies in the classified service of a school district, county office of education, or community college district that has adopted the merit system to be filled from applicants on eligibility lists that are made up, wherever practicable, from promotional examinations or by appointments made by means of transfer, demotion, reinstatement, or reemployment, as provided. Existing law requires the personnel commission to place applicants on the eligibility lists in the order of their relative merit as determined by competitive examinations. Existing law requires the final score of candidates to be rounded to the nearest whole percent. Existing law requires that if a vacancy is filled from applicants on an eligibility list, the appointment be made from the eligible candidates having the first 3 ranks on the list who are ready and willing to accept the position. This bill would require, upon approval of an action of the personnel commission of the school district, county office of education, or community college district, the classified employees of the district or county office of education to hold an election to determine by majority vote if applicants should instead be placed on eligibility lists in ranked groups according to their relative merit as determined by competitive examinations. The bill would require the commission to administer the election in a similar manner to the election for the adoption or termination of a merit system in a school district or community college district, as provided. The bill would prescribe the ballot language, as provided. To the extent the bill would impose additional duties on local educational entities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. In those districts and county offices of education that vote for the ranked group eligibility list procedure, the bill would require candidates' final examination scores to be rounded to the nearest whole percent and assembled into 5 distinct groups with fixed percentage ranges, as provided. The bill would require all appointments to be made from the highest ranking group on an eligibility list, except when that group includes fewer than 5 persons who are ready and willing to accept the position, in which case an appointment would be made from combining the next highest group or groups to include at least 5 persons ready and willing to accept the position, or if there are fewer than 5 persons who are ready and willing to accept the position in all remaining groups, from those remaining persons. The bill would authorize an eligibility list with fewer than 3 viable candidates to be considered exhausted if the appointing authority requests additional eligible candidates be certified for hiring consideration. This bill would, in those districts and county offices of education that adopted the ranked group eligibility list procedure and upon approval of an action of the personnel commission of the school district, county office of education, or community college district, require the classified employees of the district or county office of education to hold an election to determine if the district or county office of education should revert back to the individual ranking system, as provided. The bill would require the commission to administer the election in a similar manner to the election for the adoption or termination of a merit system in a school district or community college district, as provided, and would prescribe the ballot language, as provided. To the extent the bill would impose additional duties on local educational entities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Assembly Passage
May 2022
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2022
Last action Aug 22, 2022
Floor votes · Assembly May 26, 2022
How they voted
75–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 78
May 26, 2022
D
Democratic58
96% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican19
94% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
3
Aug 1, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 30, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 29, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 23, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 8, 2022
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and ED.
upper
May 26, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0.)
lower
May 19, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 19).
lower
May 11, 2022
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Apr 20, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 6, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Apr 5, 2022
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 30, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 30). Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Feb 24, 2022
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P.E. & R. and HIGHER ED.
lower
Feb 15, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Reggie Jones-Sawyer
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2045
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2045. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline