School finance: administrative employees to teacher ratio.
Summary
Existing law sets forth the maximum ratios of administrative employees to each 100 teachers in the various types of school districts. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to determine, for each current fiscal year, for each school district in the state, the total number of administrative employees except as provided, the total number of teachers except those serving in positions that are supported by federal funds or by categorical grants from any source and are in programs that require specific teacher/administrator ratios, the total maximum number of administrative employees that should be employed by the school district based upon the application of the appropriate ratio prescribed by law, and the number of administrative employees in excess of the number allowable without penalty, as provided. Existing law, for purposes of determining the allowable ratio of administrative employees to teachers for the San Diego City School District, excludes from the numbers identified pursuant to the above provisions the number of employees and the full-time equivalent of all of the fractional time of employees serving the school district in positions mandated as the result of the school district's court-ordered integration plan. This bill would extend the exclusion described above to the Los Angeles Unified School District. The bill also would, for purposes of calculating the administrative employee-to-teacher ratio in the 2022–23 to 2024–25 fiscal years, inclusive, authorize the Los Angeles Unified School District to include in the definition of "teacher," when calculating the ratio of administrative employees to teachers in the 2022–23 to 2024–25 fiscal years, inclusive, teachers who spend a majority of their time with pupils as intervention specialists or teachers who spend a majority of their time on a school campus providing training, coaching, or professional development to other teachers, or both of those. The bill would require the Los Angeles Unified School District to submit various reports related to the administrative employee-to-teacher ratio to the Superintendent, the Department of Finance, and the budget committees of both houses of the Legislature, as specified. By imposing additional reporting requirements on the Los Angeles Unified School District, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill also would make conforming and nonsubstantive changes. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Los Angeles Unified School District. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Jun 2022
Assembly Passage
May 2022
Senate Passage
Aug 2022
Signed into Law
Sep 2022
Introduced Feb 14, 2022
Signed Sep 30, 2022
Floor votes · Senate Aug 17, 2022 · Assembly May 5, 2022
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Aug 17, 2022
D
Democratic31
93% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
6
Sep 30, 2022
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2022
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 5977.).
lower
Aug 18, 2022
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 17, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4869.).
upper
Jun 20, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 9, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 8, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 8).
upper
May 18, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 5, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 61. Noes 0. Page 4578.)
lower
Apr 27, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 20, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 19, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 18, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 6).
lower
Feb 24, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 15, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Gipson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2038
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2038. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline