State Water Resources Control Board: desalination plant: feasibility study.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Department of Water Resources, not later than July 1, 2004, to report to the Legislature on potential opportunities and impediments for using seawater and brackish water desalination, and to examine what role, if any, the state should play in furthering the use of desalination technology. Existing law requires the department to convene a Water Desalination Task Force, composed of representatives from listed agencies and interest groups, to advise the department in carrying out these duties and in making recommendations to the Legislature. This bill would repeal those provisions. (2) Existing law establishes, within the California Environmental Protection Agency, the State Water Resources Control Board. The state board exercises the adjudicatory and regulatory functions of the state in the field of water resources. This bill would request the California Council on Science and Technology, in consultation with the department and state board, subject to an appropriation by the Legislature for this purpose, to undertake and complete a study of the potential for drought-resilient water supplies to meet the current and future water demand in the San Francisco Bay area, as specified. If the California Council on Science and Technology agrees to undertake and complete the study, the bill would require the study to be completed by January 1, 2025, and to be transmitted to the department, the board, and the Legislature.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Assembly Passage
May 2022
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2022
Last action Aug 11, 2022
Floor votes · Assembly May 26, 2022
How they voted
74–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 78
May 26, 2022
D
Democratic58
93% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican19
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
5
Aug 11, 2022
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 2, 2022
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jun 23, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 22, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 20).
upper
Jun 8, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
May 26, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0.)
lower
May 19, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 19, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 19).
lower
Apr 27, 2022
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Apr 5, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 4, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on W.,P., & W.
lower
Mar 31, 2022
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P., & W. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 24, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on W.,P., & W.
lower
Feb 15, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Rebecca Bauer-Kahan
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2016
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2016. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline