California Environmental Quality Act: redevelopment: Concord Naval Weapons Station.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA establishes administrative procedures for the review and certification of the EIR for a project. This bill would require the lead agency to prepare and certify the EIR for the Concord Base Reuse Project, which the bill would define as any activity related to the approval and adoption of a specific plan for the former Concord Naval Weapons Station in the City of Concord, in a specified manner that includes the concurrent preparation of the record of proceedings. By increasing the duties of the lead agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Concord. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Jun 2022
Assembly Passage
May 2022
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 10, 2022
Last action Jun 28, 2022
Floor votes · Assembly May 25, 2022
How they voted
76–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 78
May 25, 2022
D
Democratic58
96% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican19
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
6
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Jun 28, 2022
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 13, 2022
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 1, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
May 25, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 4910.)
lower
May 11, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 11).
lower
Apr 26, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 20, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 19, 2022
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 24, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 14, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 10, 2022
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 18, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 11, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tim Grayson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1935
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1935. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline