Parole hearings: victim attorneys.
Summary
Existing law requires the Board of Parole Hearings, among other responsibilities, to conduct parole suitability hearings and determine whether an inmate is suitable for parole. Existing law authorizes the victim, the victim's next of kin, the victim's family members, or two representatives designated by the victim or next of kin, to appear, personally or by counsel, at parole suitability hearings and to express their views concerning the inmate and the case. This bill would require the board, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to establish a program to provide a victim of a crime, the victim's next of kin, or a member of the victim's family, who has the right to appear at a parole suitability hearing, with compensation for reasonable actual attorney's fees and costs if the person wishes to have an attorney represent them at the hearing and the district attorney's office, or the Attorney General's office, that prosecuted the case will not have a designated representative at the hearing, as specified. The bill would require the board to limit reimbursement to only one attorney per victim per hearing, as specified, and would require the board to limit reimbursement to $900 per victim per hearing. The bill would require the district attorney's office, or the Attorney General's office, that prosecuted the case to provide reasonable notice to the board and to the crime victim, victim's next of kin, or members of the victim's family that they will not be sending a representative to a parole hearing, thereby creating a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2022
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 8, 2022
Last action May 19, 2022
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Amendments
1
May 19, 2022
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Apr 6, 2022
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Mar 23, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (March 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 15, 2022
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 14, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 10, 2022
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 18, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 9, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Suzette Valladares
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1846
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1846. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline