Vehicles: required stops: bicycles.
Summary
Existing law requires the driver of any vehicle, including a person riding a bicycle, when approaching a stop sign at the entrance of an intersection, to stop before entering the intersection. A violation of this requirement is an infraction. This bill would require a person who is 18 years of age or older riding a bicycle upon a two-lane highway when approaching a stop sign at the entrance of an intersection with another roadway with two or fewer lanes, where stop signs are erected upon all approaches, to yield the right-of-way to any vehicles that have either stopped at or entered the intersection, or that are approaching on the intersecting highway close enough to constitute an immediate hazard, and to pedestrians, as specified, and continue to yield the right-of-way to those vehicles and pedestrians until reasonably safe to proceed. The bill would require other vehicles to yield the right-of-way to a bicycle that, having yielded as prescribed, has entered the intersection. The bill would state that these provisions do not affect the liability of a driver of a motor vehicle as a result of the driver's negligent or wrongful act or omission in the operation of a motor vehicle. The bill would impose a warning citation for a first violation by a person who is under 18 years of age and fails to stop when approaching a stop sign at the entrance of an intersection. The bill would also require the Commissioner of the California Highway Patrol to submit a report to the Legislature, as specified, regarding the effects of this bill. These provisions would be repealed on January 1, 2029. By changing the elements of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2022
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Assembly Passage
May 2022
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 26, 2022
Last action Aug 29, 2022
Floor votes · Assembly May 26, 2022
How they voted
49–20
Passed · 9 other
Total votes 78
May 26, 2022
D
Democratic58
79% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican19
89% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Aug 1, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 29, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 2.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 1, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
upper
May 26, 2022
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (49-20-9)
assembly
May 25, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 20. Page 5025.)
lower
May 4, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (May 4).
lower
Mar 29, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (March 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 22, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 21, 2022
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 3, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Jan 27, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 26.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tasha Boerner
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1713
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1713. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline