Pipeline safety: carbon dioxide.
Summary
Under the Elder California Pipeline Safety Act of 1981, the State Fire Marshal exercises safety regulatory jurisdiction over intrastate pipelines used for the transportation of hazardous or highly volatile liquid substances. The act imposes various requirements in relation to the regulation of these intrastate pipelines and requires the State Fire Marshal to adopt regulations, not later than June 30, 1991, that establish procedures for maintaining, testing, and inspecting mainline valves and check valves on intrastate hazardous liquid pipelines. A person who willfully and knowingly violates the act or a regulation issued pursuant to the act is, upon conviction, subject to a fine, imprisonment, or both a fine and imprisonment, as provided. This bill would expand the regulation of intrastate pipelines under the act to intrastate pipelines used for the transportation of carbon dioxide, as defined, including by revising the definition of "pipeline" for purposes of the act to also include intrastate pipelines used for the transportation of carbon dioxide. The bill would exempt from the act intrastate gas pipelines regulated by the Public Utilities Commission. The bill would require the State Fire Marshal to adopt regulations, not later than January 1, 2025, that establish procedures for maintaining, testing, and inspecting mainline valves and check valves on intrastate hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipelines. By imposing additional requirements under the act, and requiring the State Fire Marshal to adopt regulations, relating to intrastate pipelines used for the transportation of carbon dioxide, a violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2022
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 20, 2022
Last action Apr 25, 2022
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Amendments
3
Apr 25, 2022
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 19, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 18, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 7, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 6).
lower
Apr 4, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
Mar 31, 2022
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & E. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 31, 2022
Committee
Referred to Coms. on U. & E. and NAT. RES.
lower
Jan 21, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 20.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tim Grayson
DDemocratic
Co
Cottie Petrie-Norris
DDemocratic
Co
Jordan Cunningham
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1676
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1676. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline