Oil spills: reporting: waters of the state.
Summary
The Lempert-Keene-Seastrand Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act generally requires the administrator for oil spill response, acting at the direction of the Governor, to implement activities relating to oil spill response, including drills and preparedness, and oil spill containment and cleanup. The act requires, without regard to intent or negligence, any party responsible for the discharge or threatened discharge of oil in waters of the state to report the discharge immediately to the Office of Emergency Services. The act makes it a crime to fail to notify the office in violation of that requirement. This bill would define "threatened discharge of oil in waters of the state" to mean a discharge by an offshore facility, as defined, including an offshore pipeline, located where an oil spill may impact state waters. The bill would require an offshore facility to be presumed to be located where an oil spill may impact state waters if certain circumstances apply, including that any portion of an offshore pipeline that services the offshore facility transports oil to, from, or through state waters. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2022
Committee Review
Jun 2022
Assembly Passage
May 2022
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 14, 2022
Last action Jun 28, 2022
Floor votes · Assembly May 16, 2022
How they voted
71–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 78
May 16, 2022
D
Democratic58
89% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican19
94% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Jun 14, 2022
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 25, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
May 16, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 4695.)
lower
Apr 28, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 27, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Mar 22, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 15, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 14, 2022
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Jan 27, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jan 15, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 14.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Janet Nguyen
RRepublican
Co
Laurie Davies
RRepublican
Co
Patricia C. Bates
RRepublican
Co
Phillip Chen
RRepublican
Co
Steve Choi
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1657
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1657. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline