California Environmental Quality Act: water system well and domestic well projects: exemption.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. The California Safe Drinking Water Act provides for the operation of public water systems and imposes on the State Water Resources Control Board various responsibilities and duties relating to the regulation of drinking water to protect public health. Existing law establishes the Safe and Affordable Drinking Water Fund in the State Treasury to help water systems provide an adequate and affordable supply of safe drinking water in both the near and long terms. Existing law requires the state board to annually adopt, and update every 3 years, a fund expenditure plan that contains specified information, including, but not limited to, a list of water systems that consistently fail to provide an adequate supply of safe drinking water. Existing law requires the state board to develop a drinking water needs assessment to inform the board's annual fund expenditure plan. This bill would, until January 1, 2028, exempt from CEQA a well project, as defined, that meets specified conditions, including that the domestic well or the water system to which the well is connected has been designated by the state board as high risk or medium risk in the state board's drinking water needs assessment. The bill would require a lead agency, before determining that a well project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to these provisions, to contact the state board to determine whether claiming the exemption will affect the ability of the well project to receive federal financial assistance or federally capitalized financial assistance. The bill would require a lead agency that determines that a well project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to these provisions to file a notice of exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the county clerk, as provided. Because the bill would increase the responsibilities of a lead agency related to the applicability of this exemption, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2022
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Assembly Passage
May 2022
Senate Passage
Aug 2022
Signed into Law
Sep 2022
Introduced Jan 12, 2022
Signed Sep 30, 2022
Floor votes · Senate Aug 25, 2022 · Assembly May 5, 2022
How they voted
37–0
Passed
Total votes 37
Aug 25, 2022
D
Democratic29
100% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
12
Committee
9
Amendments
6
Sep 30, 2022
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2022
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 67. Noes 2.).
lower
Aug 25, 2022
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 27 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 25, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 5120.).
upper
Aug 1, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 30, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 29, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 14, 2022
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 10, 2022
Upper · Passed
6-16-2022 hearing rescheduled by committee to 6-15-2022
upper
Jun 6, 2022
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 18, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
May 5, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 55. Noes 2. Page 4571.)
lower
Apr 27, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Mar 28, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 24, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 23, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (March 21).
lower
Jan 20, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jan 13, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 12.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Rudy Salas, Jr.
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1642
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1642. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline