Law enforcement agency policies: carrying of equipment.
Summary
Existing law requires law enforcement agencies to maintain a policy on the use of force, as specified. Existing law places certain restrictions on the use of force by law enforcement agencies, including prohibiting the use of a choke hold or carotid restraint. This bill would require a law enforcement agency that authorizes peace officers to carry an electroshock device, such as a taser or stun gun that is held and operated in a manner similar to a pistol, to require that device to be holstered or otherwise carried on the lateral side of the body opposite to the side that that officer's primary firearm is holstered. By requiring local agencies to create, promulgate, and enforce new policies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Assembly Passage
Jan 2022
Senate Passage
Aug 2022
Signed into Law
Sep 2022
Introduced Feb 19, 2021
Signed Sep 30, 2022
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2022 · Assembly Jan 31, 2022
How they voted
37–0
Passed
Total votes 37
Aug 23, 2022
D
Democratic29
100% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2022
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2022
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 23, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 4975.).
upper
Aug 11, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 11).
upper
Jun 20, 2022
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jun 1, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (May 31). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 4, 2022
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jan 31, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 3427.)
lower
Jan 27, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 3396.)
lower
Jan 20, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (January 20).
lower
Jan 11, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (January 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 4, 2022
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 3, 2022
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 20, 2021
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 11, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 20, 2021
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2021
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tom Lackey
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1406
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1406. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline