Clinical laboratory technology and pharmacists.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the licensure, registration, and regulation of clinical laboratories and various clinical laboratory personnel by the State Department of Public Health. Existing law provides that nothing in those provisions restrict, limit, or prevent any person licensed to provide health care services under the state's laws, including, but not limited to, licensed physicians and surgeons and registered nurses, from practicing the professions or occupation for which they are licensed. Existing law provides that nothing in those provisions authorize any person to perform or order health care services or utilize the results of the clinical laboratory test or examination, unless the person is otherwise authorized to provide that care or utilize the results. This bill would state that nothing in those provisions prevents a licensed pharmacist from practicing the profession or occupation for which they are licensed. The bill would also provide that nothing in those provisions authorizes any person to perform or order health care services or utilize the results of the clinical laboratory test or examination, unless the person is otherwise authorized to provide or order that care or utilize the results. Existing law prohibits the performance of a clinical laboratory test or examination classified as waived under the federal Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) unless the test or examination is performed under the overall operation and administration of a laboratory director and the test is performed by specified persons, including a pharmacist if ordering drug therapy-related laboratory tests, as provided, or if performing skin puncture, as provided. Existing law exempts from that prohibition a pharmacist at a community pharmacy who, upon customer request, performs only specified tests that are classified as waived under the CLIA and are approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for specified purposes, and meets specified requirements, including that for purposes of the CLIA that the person identified as responsible for directing and supervising testing oversight and decisionmaking be the pharmacist-in-charge. This bill would revise and expand the types of persons that may perform those tests, including licensed pharmacists, except as provided, if the results of the tests can be lawfully utilized within their practice, and would make conforming changes. The bill would broaden the exemption by providing that the above-described prohibition does not apply to a licensed pharmacist who, upon patient request or hospital authorization, performs tests that are classified as waived under the CLIA or are approved or authorized by the FDA, and meets specified requirements. The bill would remove the requirement that for purposes of the CLIA that person identified as responsible for directing and supervising testing oversight and decisionmaking be the pharmacist-in-charge. The bill would make conforming changes. (2) Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of pharmacists by the California State Board of Pharmacy in the Department of Consumer Affairs. That law makes it a misdemeanor for any person to knowingly violate any of the provisions of that law when no other penalty is provided. That law authorizes a pharmacist to order and interpret tests, among other things, for the purpose of monitoring and managing the efficacy and toxicity of drug therapies. This bill would authorize a pharmacist to order and interpret tests for the purpose of promoting patient health. The Pharmacy Law also authorizes a pharmacist to perform specified procedures or functions as part of the care provided by certain facilities or persons, as provided, in accordance with the policies, procedures, or protocols of those facilities or persons. Under existing law, those procedures or functions include ordering or performing routine drug therapy-related patient assessment procedures, ordering screening or drug therapy-related tests, and administering drugs and biologicals by injection pursuant to a prescriber's order. Existing law requires the policies, procedures, or protocols to include, among other things, a requirement that those procedures to be performed by the pharmacist relate to a condition for which the patient has first been seen by a physician. This bill would expand the procedures or functions that a pharmacist may perform as part of the care provided by certain facilities or persons, as provided, including by authorizing a pharmacist to order or perform patient assessment procedures. The bill would revise the requirements relating to the policies, procedures, or protocols by requiring that the procedures to be performed by the pharmacist relate to a condition for which the patient has first been seen by a diagnosing or treating prescriber. Existing law authorizes a pharmacist to perform skin puncture in the course of performing routine patient assessment procedures or other specified procedures. Existing law defines routine patient assessment procedure as a procedure that a patient could, with or without a prescription, perform for themselves, or clinical laboratory tests that are classified as waived pursuant to the CLIA, as provided. This bill would remove from the definition of routine patient assessment procedures a procedure that a patient could, with or without a prescription, perform for themselves. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Assembly Passage
May 2021
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2021
Last action Aug 31, 2022
Floor votes · Assembly May 13, 2021
How they voted
71–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 78
May 13, 2021
D
Democratic58
94% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican19
78% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Amendments
5
Aug 11, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 26, 2021
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 16, 2021
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jul 14, 2021
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 13, 2021
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (July 12).
upper
May 27, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
May 13, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 1406.)
lower
May 5, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 5).
lower
Apr 22, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 21, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 20, 2021
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 20).
lower
Mar 24, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Mar 23, 2021
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 4, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 20, 2021
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2021
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jacqui Irwin
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1328
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1328. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline