Resentencing.
Summary
Existing law authorizes, when a defendant has been committed to the state prison or to a county jail for the commission of a felony, the court to recall the sentence and commitment previously ordered and resentence the defendant in the same manner as if the defendant had not previously been sentenced if doing so is in the interest of justice. Existing law authorizes a defendant to be resentenced pursuant to these provisions upon the court's own motion within 120 days of the date of commitment, or upon the recommendation of specified individuals, including, among others, the district attorney of the county in which the defendant was sentenced. This bill would additionally authorize a petition for recall and resentencing by a defendant who has served at least 15 years of their sentence and has at least 24 months of their sentence remaining. The bill would also establish procedural requirements for resentencing a defendant pursuant to these provisions including by, among other things, requiring a petition for resentencing to be filed with the presiding judge of the superior court in which the defendant was originally sentenced, requiring the presiding judge, or a judge appointed by the presiding judge, to act on the petition within 90 days of the petition having been filed, and requiring the court to specify the reason for its judgment on the petition. The bill would, if a petition for recall and resentencing is filed by the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, the Board of Parole Hearings, a county correctional administrator, or the district attorney of the county in which the defendant was sentenced, and the petition is based on a defendant's exceptional rehabilitation while imprisoned, require the court to appoint counsel for the defendant and hold a hearing on the petition and would prohibit the court from denying the petition to recall and resentence the defendant unless there is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is likely to commit a future violent crime. To the extent this bill would require local public defenders to provide a higher level of service, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would, upon appropriation by the Legislature, allocate savings accrued as a result of resentencing a defendant pursuant to these provisions who was sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison to the district attorney of the county in which the resentencing occurred, to the superior court in the county in which the resentencing occurred, and, in certain instances, to the public defender of the county in which the resentencing occurred. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2021
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2021
Last action Feb 1, 2022
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Feb 1, 2022
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 20, 2021
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 12, 2021
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 28, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 15, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 11, 2021
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 11, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 20, 2021
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
Feb 19, 2021
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ken Cooley
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1245
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1245. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline