State government.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, the Alfred E. Alquist Seismic Safety Commission is established as an independent unit within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency. Existing law provides that the commission is composed of 20 members, with 15 commissioners appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate, and 5 members from specified state agencies. This bill would instead establish the Alfred E. Alquist Seismic Safety Commission as a separate unit within the Office of Emergency Services. The bill would reduce the number of commissioners from 20 to 15 and would provide that the Governor appoint 10 of the 15 commissioners, with 2 commissioners appointed by the Legislature and 3 commissioners serving as representatives of specified state agencies. The bill would specify the background qualifications for the commissioners. The bill would also expand the number of public entities that provide regular updates to the commission regarding earthquake preparedness and seismic safety activities. The bill would also make conforming changes and update statutory language. (2) Existing law requires the Secretary of State to use funds appropriated to the Secretary of State in the Budget Act of 2018 and the Budget Act of 2019 for voting system replacement for counties by awarding reimbursement contracts to counties for voting system replacement using a specified funding allocation. To receive reimbursement, a county is required to provide matching funds that are at least equivalent to 14 of the state funds received for the eligible expenditures. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to reimburse the county by matching county funds spent on a 3-to-1 basis, up to the maximum amount of funds allocated for the contract. This bill would include costs reasonably related to the administration of an election during the COVID-19 pandemic as an eligible expenditure that is reimbursable. For the eligible expenditures made on or after July 1, 2020, and before July 1, 2021, the bill would specify that a county is not required to provide matching funds, and would require the Secretary of State to reimburse the county for eligible expenditures, up to the maximum amount of funds allocated for the contract. By removing a restriction on the expenditure of funds available under an existing appropriation, this bill would make an appropriation. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2020
Committee Review
Jun 2020
Senate Passage
Jun 2020
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 10, 2020
Last action Jun 22, 2020
Floor votes · Senate Jun 18, 2020
How they voted
29–11
Passed
Total votes 40
Jun 18, 2020
D
Democratic29
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Jun 18, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Jun 18, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 11. Page 3734.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Jan 22, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
upper
Jan 10, 2020
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 809
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 809. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline