Long duration bulk energy storage: procurement.
Summary
Existing law provides for the establishment of an Independent System Operator (ISO) , under the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) , to secure generating and transmission resources necessary to guarantee achievement of specified minimum planning and operating reserve criteria for much of the state's electrical transmission system. This bill would require the ISO, on or before June 30, 2022, to complete a competitive solicitation process for the procurement of one or more long duration energy storage projects that in aggregate have at least 2,000 megawatts capacity, but not more than 2,400 megawatts, as provided. The bill would require the ISO, after December 31, 2030, and only if found to be necessary, to complete an additional competitive solicitation process for additional long duration bulk energy storage projects that in aggregate have up to 2,000 megawatts capacity and have targeted commercial operation dates of no later than January 1, 2045. The bill would require that the competitive solicitation processes provide for cost recovery from load-serving entities within the ISO-controlled electrical grid in a manner that allocates those costs among load-serving entities based on cost causation and each load-serving entity's need for, and benefits realized from, the long duration bulk energy storage. If FERC takes any action that materially affects California's clean energy and climate laws, programs, or policies, the bill would relieve the ISO from the duty to comply with the bill's requirements, as specified. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act, a violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
May 2019
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2019
Last action Feb 3, 2020
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2019
How they voted
38–0
Passed
Total votes 38
May 29, 2019
D
Democratic28
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
5
Committee
3
Amendments
2
May 29, 2019
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0)
senate
May 24, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
May 17, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 17, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1108.) (May 16).
upper
Apr 24, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1. Page 843.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 14, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
upper
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 772
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 772. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline