California Public Records Act: trade secrets.
Summary
The California Public Records Act requires state and local agencies to make their records available for public inspection, unless an exemption from disclosure applies. Existing law provides that nothing in the act requires the disclosure of corporate proprietary information including trade secrets, among other things. This bill would provide that specified records of a private industry employer that are prepared, owned, used, or retained by a public agency are not trade secrets and are public records, including certain records relating to employment terms and conditions of employees working for a private industry employer pursuant to a contract with a public agency, if those wages, benefits, working hours and other employment terms and conditions relate to work performed under the contract, records of compliance with local, state, or federal domestic content requirements, and records of a private industry employer's compliance with job creation, job quality, or job retention obligations contained in a contract or agreement with a state or local agency. The bill, however, would exclude contracts between a public agency and a private industry employer entered into before January 1, 2020, and records that include communications between the state or local agency and specified state or local officials, on matters posing a threat to the security of a public building, a threat to the security of essential public services, or a threat to the public's right of access to public services or public facilities, from these provisions. Because the bill would require local officials to perform additional duties, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
passed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Sep 2019
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Sep 2019
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2019
Last action Aug 25, 2020
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2019 · Assembly Sep 6, 2019
How they voted
20–10
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
May 30, 2019
D
Democratic27
74% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
38
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Sep 10, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 6, 2019
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (40-15-19)
assembly
Sep 6, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. (Ayes 43. Noes 16. Page 3077.)
lower
Sep 3, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 30).
lower
Jun 18, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (June 18).
lower
Jun 6, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 30, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 12. Page 1383.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 23, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
May 16, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 1108.) (May 16).
upper
Apr 25, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 800.) (April 23).
upper
Apr 3, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 14, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
María Elena Durazo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 749
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 749. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline