School facilities: design-build projects.
Summary
Existing law authorizes, until January 1, 2025, a school district governing board to enter into a design-build contract, as defined, in which factors in addition to price and cost may be considered in awarding a contract for the design and construction of a school facility that exceeds $1,000,000. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. This bill would specify that a certain school district entering into a design-build contract for projects that are subject to a project labor agreement retains the discretion to take specified actions related to the contract. The bill would require the contract to contain specified terms and conditions. The bill would prohibit a design-build entity or its subcontractor performing work on a project for a school district from engaging in any activity under the design-build contract beyond the design phase of the contract unless the school district issues certain notices, including a notice to proceed with the construction. The bill would, for purposes of procuring or awarding a design-build contract for a project, deem a school district to have complied with CEQA if the school district retains the discretion to take those specified actions and the contract contains those required terms and conditions. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Los Angeles Unified School District.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jul 2019
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Aug 2019
Signed into Law
Sep 2019
Introduced Feb 22, 2019
Signed Sep 6, 2019
Floor votes · Senate May 6, 2019 · Assembly Aug 19, 2019
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
May 6, 2019
D
Democratic27
100% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Sep 6, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 19, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2753.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Jul 11, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 10).
lower
May 16, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
May 6, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 962.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 29, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
Apr 10, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 650.) (April 10).
upper
Apr 3, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Mar 14, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Robert M. Hertzberg
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 743
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 743. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline