Surplus nonresidential property and State Highway Route 710.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes priorities and procedures that any state agency disposing of surplus residential property is required to follow. Under existing law, specified single-family residences must first be offered to their former owners or present occupants, as specified. Existing law also gives tenants in good standing of nonresidential properties priority to purchase, at fair market value, the property they rent, lease, or otherwise legally occupy. This bill would require a state agency to give priority to a tenant in good standing of a nonresidential property to purchase, at the lesser of fair market value or value in use, as defined, if the tenant is a city or a nonprofit organization, as specified. The bill would prohibit the Department of Transportation from selling a nonresidential property to a tenant described above at a value below the minimum sales price, as defined in the department's Affordable Sales Program as of July 1, 2019. The bill would require the selling agency, if a nonresidential property is offered at a price that is less than fair market value, to impose appropriate terms, conditions, and restrictions. (2) Existing law provides, notwithstanding any other law, for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, that the preliminary project alternative referred to as Alternative F-6 in the December 2012 Alternative Analysis Report of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority is no longer deemed to be a feasible alternative for consideration in any state environmental review process for the Interstate 710 North Gap Closure project. This bill would revise this provision to instead provide that the preliminary project alternatives referred to as Alternative F-5, F-6, and F-7 in the December 2012 Alternative Analysis Report of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority and any other freeway or tunnel alternatives to close the Interstate 710 North Gap are no longer deemed to be feasible alternatives for consideration in any environmental review process for the Interstate 710 North Gap Closure project. (3) Existing law prohibits the Department of Transportation, until January 1, 2020, from increasing the rent of tenants who reside in surplus residential property located within the State Route 710 corridor in the County of Los Angeles and who participate in the Affordable Rent Program administered by the department. This bill would make this prohibition permanent and would also provide that signatories of active rental agreements for residential property entered into with the department as of July 1, 2019, and continuously residing at the property since that date, may be eligible to participate in the department's Affordable Rent Program. (4) Existing law vests the Department of Transportation with full possession and control of all state highways and associated property. Existing law designates and describes state highway routes, and also describes the state highway routes in the California freeway and expressway system, including all of State Highway Route 710 in the County of Los Angeles. This bill would, on January 1, 2024, remove from the California freeway and expressway system the portion of Route 710 between Alhambra Avenue in the City of Los Angeles and California Boulevard in the City of Pasadena. (5) Existing law establishes a process for the California Transportation Commission to adopt a highway on an authorized route, requires the commission to relinquish to local agencies state highway portions that have been deleted from the state highway system by legislative enactment, and authorizes relinquishment in certain other cases. This bill would authorize the commission to relinquish to the City of Pasadena the specified portions of Route 710 within its city limits, upon terms and conditions the commission finds to be in the best interests of the state, if the department and the city enter into an agreement providing for that relinquishment.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Sep 2019
Signed into Law
Oct 2019
Introduced Dec 3, 2018
Signed Oct 12, 2019
Floor votes · Senate May 22, 2019 · Assembly Sep 14, 2019
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
May 22, 2019
D
Democratic27
100% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
10
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Oct 12, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 14, 2019
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 2960.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 14, 2019
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 14, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 63. Noes 7. Page 3613.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Sep 3, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 30).
lower
Jul 2, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 3, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
May 22, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1216.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 17, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 17, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 1086.) (May 16).
upper
Apr 10, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 1. Page 655.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 24, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
upper
Dec 3, 2018
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Anthony Portantino
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Co
Wendy Carrillo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 7
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 7. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline