SB 695 California Senate · 2019-2020 Regular Session

Special education: individualized education programs: translation services.

Summary
Existing law requires local educational agencies to identify, locate, and assess individuals with exceptional needs and to provide those pupils with a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment, with special education and related services as reflected in an individualized education program. Existing law requires a local educational agency to initiate and conduct meetings for purposes of developing, reviewing, and revising the individualized education program of each individual with exceptional needs in accordance with federal law. Existing law requires the local educational agency to take any action necessary to ensure that the parent of the individual with exceptional needs understands the proceedings at a meeting, including arranging for an interpreter for parents with deafness or whose native language is a language other than English. Existing law defines "parent" for purposes of these provisions to mean a biological or adoptive parent, a foster parent, a guardian generally authorized to act as the child's parent or authorized to make educational decisions for the child, an individual acting in the place of a biological or adoptive parent, or a surrogate parent, as specified. Existing law requires that a person who meets the definition of "parent," except for a surrogate parent, be determined to be the "parent" for purposes of these provisions if there is a judicial decree or order identifying that person, as specified. This bill would revise the definition of "parent" to specify that it also includes the educational rights holder and the conservator of a child. The bill would instead require that a person who meets the definition of "parent," including all categories of people included in that definition, be determined to be the "parent" for purposes of these provisions if there is a judicial decree or order identifying that person, as specified. The bill would instead require a local educational agency to take any action necessary to ensure that the parent understands the proceedings during the planning process for the individualized education program, including during the individualized education program team meeting. The bill would require this action to include, as applicable, communicating in the parent's native language, or in another mode of communication used by the parent, arranging for an interpreter, providing translation services, and providing alternative communication services, as specified. The bill would require a local educational agency, upon request by a pupil's parent, to translate into the native language of the parent, or into another mode of communication used by the parent, the pupil's completed individualized education program, any revisions to the individualized education program, and certain documents discussed at an individualized education program team meeting. The bill would require, for a parent whose native language is one of the 8 most commonly spoken languages, as provided, excluding English, in a local educational agency, that the completed individualized education program and any revisions to the individualized education program be translated within 30 calendar days of that meeting or within 30 calendar days of a later request. The bill would require the documents to be translated by a qualified translator, as defined. The bill would require the State Department of Education to revise its notice of procedural safeguards, in English and in the primary languages for which the department has developed translated versions, to inform parents of their right to request the translation of these documents. By imposing additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law defines "local educational agency" for purposes of special education programs to include, among others, a nonprofit charter school participating as a member of a special education local plan area. The bill would revise the definition of "local educational agency" for purposes of special education programs to include, among others, a charter school participating as a member of a special education local plan area. To the extent that this revision would impose duties on additional charter schools, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Sep 2019
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Sep 2019
Vetoed
Jan 2020
Introduced Feb 22, 2019 Vetoed Jan 13, 2020
Floor votes · Senate May 28, 2019 · Assembly Sep 10, 2019

How they voted

312
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 34
May 28, 2019
D Democratic26
24 Yea 2 Nay
92% Yea
R Republican8
7 Yea 1
87% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
41
Key actions
13
Committee
12
Amendments
3
Jan 13, 2020
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Oct 12, 2019
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 12, 2019
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 12, 2019
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 6. Page 2885.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 2873.)
upper
Sep 10, 2019
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-4-7)
assembly
Sep 10, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on ED. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2733.) Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Sep 10, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).
upper
Sep 9, 2019
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 9, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 67. Noes 4. Page 3197.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 3.) (August 30).
lower
Jul 11, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (July 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 17, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on ED. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jun 13, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jun 6, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and L. GOV.
lower
May 28, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 2. Page 1334.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 22, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
May 16, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1107.) (May 16).
upper
Apr 23, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 776.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 9, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on HUMAN S. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 552.) (April 2).
upper
Mar 14, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HOUSING and HUMAN S.
upper
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Anthony Portantino
Anthony Portantino
DDemocratic
CA
25